Thread: V-6 Turbo?
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 09:48 PM
Scooter71 Scooter71 is offline
Member
Points: 894, Level: 11
Points: 894, Level: 11 Points: 894, Level: 11 Points: 894, Level: 11
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
Photos: (0)
Lightbulb Re: V-6 Turbo?

Originally Posted by Kelsey73 View Post
I hear ya scooter, and I don't disagree, but I think Dodge should look at modernizing the current V-8s before they jump to the V6 as a performance option. I think the current 6.1 could be doing WAY better on fuel consumption than it is. I'm not very up to date on the 5.7, but I know the 6.1 is a very simple engine and could benefit from a DOHC, VVT, and multiple valves, just to name a few. It'd be pretty easy to make a forced injection V6 "faster" than a stock R/T just from the lack of weight, and add 80-100 HP more to the V6 and you've got a pretty potent car there.

I think it'd sell great though. Maybe not with the 30+ crowd, but with the 30 and under guys. Look at the old twin turbo stealths, there still a really desired car. All the time I have kids my age tell me that a V8 is a waste of money because their turbo 4s and V6s will keep up. There's just not a good rep on big V8s around here.

Like I said before, I don't disagree with ya, just not my cup of tea!

Well, I for one would like to take such a Challenger for a ride! As I've drove many standard 3.5L and 5.7L LX Cars. Yet, I think something in the middle is missing? Really, the 4.0L has a little more torque than the 3.5L and over a broader band. Which, would likely give the Challenger a more V-8 like feel? Add a 6-Speed Manual and it could be a interesting.........
Reply With Quote