Thread: What's missing?
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 11:18 PM
Kelsey73's Avatar
Kelsey73 Kelsey73 is offline
Senior Member
Points: 1,918, Level: 17
Points: 1,918, Level: 17 Points: 1,918, Level: 17 Points: 1,918, Level: 17
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ft. Smith AR
Posts: 443
Photos: (0)
Re: What's missing?

Originally Posted by Scooter71 View Post
Well, I have to say I was surprised at the 4,000 plus lbs weight of the Challenger! This will clearly be handicap compared to the much lighter Mustang and Camaro. That said, the Challenger will be a better riding and possibly better handling car than the former two. This also gets back to my other posting about fuel mileage! While, some don't consider the issue as much of a concern. With $3.50 per gallon and only going up.........makes one ponder if History could repeat itself? Remember, high fuel prices and insurance rates doom the original muscle cars of the late 60's and early 70's! As a matter of fact I figured Dodge would follow the suit with the 300, Charger, and Magnum........offering a 2.7L as the base model and then moving up to the 3.5L, 5.7L, and finally 6.1L.
I think the 2.7L is going to fade out when the 4.0 hits.
__________________
2007 White Shelby GT
2008 Hemi Orange Challenger SRT8
Reply With Quote