Originally Posted by MoparMuscle
OK... Wow.. you're an idiot. OK.. since the 60's... OK so how about the 70 challenger... no.. i bet that WASNT a full frame.. NOT. obviously it was. Challenger, Cuda, GTO, Chevelle, Torino, Mustang, Camaro, Satelite, etc. All full frames there bud. And that's just mentioning a few. Ok so anyone else wanna comment on my question? Cuz obviously this guy doesn't know.
OK, I don't know why you would reject ND Rams answer so rudely,
then ask the question again?
Cuz Obviously, you don't know, and refuse to be informed,
and choose to insult anyone whose answer you do not understand.
Not a real good way to make points with the more mature members of the group,
the old guys that know stuff.
ND Ram is basically correct; I could elaborate
a lot,
but you're probably not listening anyway.
Short answer;
there is no necessary correlation between rear wheel drive and full-frame construction,
and every car you named is a rear wheel drive unibody chassis.
[edit; except Chevelle & GTO; GM never being known to demonstrate progressive engineering,
which after all, might result in better products.
]
