Just got back from the dyno... Stock - Diablo 93oct tune - Custom tune - Page 3 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#21 (permalink) Old 11-09-2012, 06:41 PM
Senior Member
 
rayzazoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In my Challenger
Posts: 4,868
Thanks: 381
Thanked 837 Times in 492 Posts
Feedback Score: 5 reviews
So roughly from 470hp/470tq to 505hp/490tq with the custom tune. Not bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide.com App


2015 376 cu-in SRT S/C Hellcat Torred (Tori 3.0) (ordered; BX)
2012 392 cu-in SRT8 Tungsten (IronMaiden) - 12.847 @ 109.89 mph
2010 370 cu-in SRT8 Torred (Tori 2.0)- 12.604 @ 112.11 mph (Spartan Cam) / 12.817 @ 110.05 mph
2009 345 cu-in R/T Torred (Tori 1.0) - 13.291 @ 103.67 mph

Bolt-On Mod Information

Last edited by rayzazoo; 11-09-2012 at 06:44 PM.
rayzazoo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2012, 06:45 PM
Senior Member
 
rander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 382
Thanks: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
lol! Good one

Quote:
Originally Posted by CruzKing View Post
rander that looks good, now you can give those pesty 09/10 auto RTs a run for their money.

2012 Dodge White Charger

PB 1/8 run: 7.92 @ 86.92 * 1.76 60' on street tires

rander is offline  
#23 (permalink) Old 11-09-2012, 06:47 PM
Senior Member
 
rander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 382
Thanks: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
Somewhere there abouts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rayzazoo View Post
So roughly from 470hp/470tq to 505hp/490tq with the custom tune. Not bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide.com App
rander is offline  
#24 (permalink) Old 11-09-2012, 08:39 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,775
Thanks: 111
Thanked 558 Times in 405 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayzazoo View Post
So roughly from 470hp/470tq to 505hp/490tq with the custom tune. Not bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide.com App
nope.

470/470 to 487/500

Litos is offline  
#25 (permalink) Old 11-09-2012, 09:03 PM
Senior Member
 
rander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 382
Thanks: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
I think it's more like this at the crank adding 20% parastic loss:

stock:
377 * 1.25 = 471.25 HP

385 * 1.25 = 481.25 TQ

Custom:

394 * 1.25 = 492.5 HP

415 * 1.25 = 518.75 TQ

Crap can't remember how it goes. Can someone confirm this?
rander is offline  
#26 (permalink) Old 11-10-2012, 08:30 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,775
Thanks: 111
Thanked 558 Times in 405 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by rander View Post
I think it's more like this at the crank adding 20% parastic loss:

394 * 1.25 = 492.5 HP

415 * 1.25 = 518.75 TQ
uummmm, in my opinion 20% might be a hair too much.

would be safer to go with 17-18% - ask Brian what he thinks.

i'm no pinball wizard but based on an 18% loss, the numbers are below

crank hp = 481

crank tq = 507
Litos is offline  
#27 (permalink) Old 11-10-2012, 09:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Toxic11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 5,538
Thanks: 277
Thanked 1,168 Times in 697 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Litos View Post
uummmm, in my opinion 20% might be a hair too much.

would be safer to go with 17-18% - ask Brian what he thinks.

i'm no pinball wizard but based on an 18% loss, the numbers are below

crank hp = 481

crank tq = 507

17-18% is way high for a modern automatic, more like 13-15%

Brett DiMichele

2011 Toxic Orange

2015 SRT Hellcat on order with Bob Frederick (Billet Silver, Sepia Languna)

2011-2029 A Sparkly Moose Beaver Production

www.toxic11.com
Toxic11 is online now  
#28 (permalink) Old 11-10-2012, 09:18 AM
Senior Member
 
EricG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 322
Thanked 422 Times in 313 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
^^^Agreed. These Mercedes autos are very efficient. Plus the drivetrain can only soak up so much power, after you take ~13% of the first 400, I bet you get to keep most of the rest for the # at the wheels.

'12 Challenger SRT8 Pitch Black 6-speed, stripe delete, all options
-AFR functional SHAKER hood, Hurst/Mopar short throw pistol grip W/Larry's mod, Corsa Extreme, Jet 180 t-stat, HEMI FEVER tune, BT catch can, ceramic tint/clear bra/C-Quartz...you know, some other crap too
13.56@104.38 stock tune/tires DA 7170 - that's 12.33@114.45 corrected!!!
EricG is offline  
#29 (permalink) Old 11-10-2012, 09:33 AM
Senior Member
 
rander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 382
Thanks: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
we know the 6.4 does 470/470 on an engine dyno. And yes the nag1 is efficient like said, but I added the transmission parasitic loss plus the parasitic loss from the load of a mustang dyno. If we use the numbers from the stock tune to get to the 470 number at the crank comes out to roughly 20% loss all around. Wouldn't that make sense?
rander is offline  
#30 (permalink) Old 11-10-2012, 10:05 AM
Senior Member
 
chris1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pineville, LA
Posts: 2,772
Thanks: 7
Thanked 135 Times in 96 Posts
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by rander View Post
I think it's more like this at the crank adding 20% parastic loss:

stock:
377 * 1.25 = 471.25 HP

385 * 1.25 = 481.25 TQ

Custom:

394 * 1.25 = 492.5 HP

415 * 1.25 = 518.75 TQ

Crap can't remember how it goes. Can someone confirm this?
A better way would be:

(470-377)/470 = 19.79% loss

So there for:
stock HP: 377/(1-.1979)= 470.0
stock TQ: 485/(1-.1979)= 480.0

CMR HP: 394/(1-.1979)= 491.2
CMR TQ: 415/(1-.1979)= 517.4

BTW- Congrats on the HP/TQ bump! Can't wait to see what the 392s can put down at the track with custom and canned tunes!

2009 Dodge Challenger R/T A5

JBA shorties, JBA catless mids, 3" MBRP catback, k&n drop-in filter (with the stock box), 3200 FTI TC, MTCM, canned DS 91oct tune, and 275/40/17 MT ET's

1/4 mile PB 12.429@109.01

Last edited by chris1992; 11-10-2012 at 10:06 AM.
chris1992 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > Model Specific Discussion > Dodge Challenger SRT8 Specific > 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?)

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DiabloSport Inc. Trinity T-1000 (Official Announcement) JakeInFla Performance Modifications 143 11-19-2012 01:33 AM
So I reverted back to the stock 392 intake... RobF Performance Modifications 0 08-09-2012 08:55 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome