Took my newly B&G tuned 392 to the track - Page 8 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Featured Product
» Auto Insurance

» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > Model Specific Discussion > Dodge Challenger SRT8 Specific > 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?)

ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2012, 06:12 PM
Toxic11's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 4,093
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 217 Times in 161 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Toxic11 Send a message via AIM to Toxic11
Originally Posted by Heminator View Post
Anyone running DRs on a 392 M6 should have DSS 1400 axles and a Hop Not kit.
Absolutely concur! Anything else and it's gonna be KABOOM!
__________________
Brett DiMichele

2011 Toxic Orange


©2011-2029 A Sparkly Moose Beaver Production

www.toxic11.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2012, 05:19 AM
Heminator's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,032
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by Kakdiesel1 View Post
Didnt want this to be power trip posts but, from my limited experience this car feels like it can run 12's all day WO a tune. Yes I have an Auto and maybe this is Apples to Oranges and Turbines do not compare to NAEngines. I would love to meet someone with a 392 Manual and a tune and settle this in a friendly way. We can even switch cars. Im sure we can all be friends, we all have Hemi's of course.
Talk is Talk everyone agrees. The DA in Jersey right now is -800 today and on average so, this car should run in the low 12's im getting from some of you?
There is really nothing to settle. This is nothing more than a case of you being unaware that the M6 392 consistently runs 0.5 seconds slower than an A5 392. Yes a bone stock A5 392 will generally run 12s all day regardless of the weather. In poor DA expect 12.8x and in great DA expect 12.3x. Most times fall somewhere in between - like you experienced. And Litos is correct - in negative DA your times should have been better than 12.5x, which indicates you have some room for improvement in the launch technique.

The M6 is a PITA to launch properly - either it bogs or blows off the tires along with major wheel hop. A perfect launch means slipping the clutch at 4500 RPM to get the car moving without bog or wheel hop. Even then it will lag behind the A5 about 2 tenths to 60'. And every time the M6 is shifted it loses a tenth when zero power is applied to the rear wheels when the clutch is depressed. All things considered, the M6 is typically a low 13 second car, with high 12s being a hero pass. A tuned M6 with all the usual bolt-ons and DRs and a willingness to bust the halfshafts will eke out a 12.4x pass, which is about what a bone stock A5 will do.

M6 owners know all of this - now you do too. We selected that tranny option for the fun factor on the street and the nostalgia of rowing your own gears in one of the last true muscle cars. If I wanted a drag strip queen I would have bought an A5 - it is undeniably the far quicker car in a straight line and also generates much less stress on the drivetrain.
__________________
2011 SRT8 392 IE #88 DWB: M6, 430N, Group II, Mopar Appearance Package
  • B&G 93 PCM tune
  • Airaid CAI
  • Speedlogix '392' catch can
  • Modern Muscle 85 mm ported TB
  • Jet 180F t-stat
  • Hurst shifter w/ G&K throw-rod
  • Corsa Xtreme cat-back
  • Hop Not - Stage I & II
  • Razor's Edge front strut brace
  • Razor's Edge rear arched strut brace
  • MirrorTap - Escort 9500ix
  • Speedlogix parking brake pedal cover
  • Mopar locking gas gap
  • Mopar gas cap cover
  • BFG g-Force Sport Comp-2 (275/40 & 245/45)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Heminator For This Useful Post:
JDGA80 (11-29-2012)
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2012, 07:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 139
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Shot peeened?

Originally Posted by Heminator View Post
Which is why the GT500 has a live rear axle and parts which can withstand a direct mortar hit. And also why the ZL1 (while still a IRS) has a massively upgraded diff and half shafts.

The diff failure surprised me - the SRT is shot peened for 2011+ for extra strength. The busted half-shafts didn't surprise me at all - and are the reason I won't mount DRs on my car. Anyone running DRs on a 392 M6 should have DSS 1400 axles and a Hop Not kit.
I have been trying to understand the part number change 11+ for the 226 Getrag LSD ( example the 3.06 11+ number is 68085306AA) perhaps this being "shot peened" explains it. Where did you get this information and what ohter changes were made to account for the part number change?
__________________


2008 SRT8 Hemi Orange Pearl, Auto, 180, AFE II CAI, Inertia SRTMax cam, Inertia Performance 6.1L Heads, Inertia ported intake, BBK 85MM TB, Tuned by Dave Katz EFI Specialties , Ceramic pads, Magnaflow Hi Flow Mids & 16509 cat back, 2012 226mm Getrag LSD 3.06 upgrade, DSS 1000HP axles
447 HP, 419 TQ before exhaust.
1970 RS z28 -
MuscleCar TV Feb 2011, Currently on Haggerty Ins Commercial
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2012, 07:26 AM
Heminator's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,032
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by fastfranky View Post
I have been trying to understand the part number change 11+ for the 226 Getrag LSD ( example the 3.06 11+ number is 68085306AA) perhaps this being "shot peened" explains it. Where did you get this information and what ohter changes were made to account for the part number change?
The shot peen upgrade was mentioned by numerous auto-mags and also SRT engineers when the 392 debuted. I do not know what other changes were made to the diff.

This C&D write-up came straight from an interview with Tom McCarthy SRT Challenger Chief Engineer. The shot-peen upgrade is mentioned.

2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 First Drive: Dodge Challenger Review – Car and Driver
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > Model Specific Discussion > Dodge Challenger SRT8 Specific > 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?)

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How about a 392 timeslip sticky Dadstoy Track Talk 271 05-09-2013 11:10 AM
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 ResumeSpeed 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 36 11-28-2012 03:44 AM
SRT LLC, TTi, and B&G to Create Hot 392 Tune Red Barron Vendor Deals 23 08-31-2012 09:38 PM
B&G Ordered for 2011 392 with the A5 SparkChicken 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 89 07-28-2012 08:27 PM
Touge.ca #13: July 21st Saturday Cayuga TMP track event, 5 - 9pm! 20+ Events 2012!! Touge.ca Canada 0 07-19-2012 10:54 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.