2011 R/T intake: Stock airbox best? - Page 2 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Featured Product
Auto Insurance

Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > Performance Modifications > Bolt On's

Bolt On's Anything related to the quick Bolt-On mods. From Intakes to Exhausts. This includes Cams and Heads.

ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 08:22 AM
YO-EL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Phila Suburbs
Posts: 705
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 81 Times in 54 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Actually the LMI Air Hammer makes about 10 RWHP & TQ over the stock box..

Its reducing tube design actually creates faster & higher flow into the throttle body.

Proven to out flow other intakes, even the Frankentake IV which uses a 4" tube all the way.

I noticed once I installed the LMI Air Hammer that my car seems to pull harder at increased throttle, and overall, seems less restrictive, than the stock air box.. It definitely feels more responsive, "free-er", smoother, if that makes any sense..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 02:35 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 14
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
OK, so from what I've read (with respect to the shorter tubes), it seems that there are some tq/hp gains that are realized in the upper RPM ranges, with a sacrifice to some throttle off the line and in the lower RPM range resulting from the initial pull of higher temp air from the shorter intakes.

It seems these gains (and losses) are mostly from a less restrictive filter, and a higher air flow rate through the intake tube, which aftermarket systems seem to have over the stock.

I'm curious if this increase in flow rate is just a result of the nature of the shorter tubing, meaning that it is easier to pull the air through the shorter distance from the engine compartment rather than draw it from the length of the full cold air tube beginning under the fender.

With this logic (and I'm aware that I could be completely mistaken), it seems that an intake design similar to the Volant, which has a shorter pipe, a high-flow filter and a (mostly) closed airbox that draws from below the front fender as well as through the grill (the airbox has an opening at the front) would be the best of both worlds.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 02:42 PM
Gator Brah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gainesville - Florida
Posts: 943
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 78 Times in 41 Posts
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Re: 2011 R/T intake: Stock airbox best?

Tube length makes a difference. I had a intake tube that ran down past the stock intake box to behind the wheel. I modified it to a shorter ram style intake and there was a noticeable difference in power
__________________

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 03:10 PM
OmahaRumble's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,908
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 264
Thanked 418 Times in 299 Posts
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Originally Posted by YO-EL View Post
Actually the LMI Air Hammer makes about 10 RWHP & TQ over the stock box..

Its reducing tube design actually creates faster & higher flow into the throttle body.

Proven to out flow other intakes, even the Frankentake IV which uses a 4" tube all the way.

I noticed once I installed the LMI Air Hammer that my car seems to pull harder at increased throttle, and overall, seems less restrictive, than the stock air box.. It definitely feels more responsive, "free-er", smoother, if that makes any sense..
The AFE Stage 2 cold air intake also uses this exact same design. I like mine a lot, and definitely noticed more get up and go. This is only for '08-'10 Challengers though, they changed the design in 2011.
__________________
-= 2010 Dodge Challenger R/T Classic =- in Brilliant Black. STP, sunroof, tint, 430 rbz, 3.92 gears, 6 speed.
MODS:
Zoomers catback exhaust
AFE Stage II cold air intake
Barton short throw shifter
Fastman ported throttle body
Diablo CMR tune by Johan
Mopar strut tower brace
Spohn rear suspension kit (in August)
Jet 180* t-stat
SRT8 6.1 chin spoiler
SLP skip shift eliminator
Billet Technology catch can
Beltronics Pro 300 radar detector

Last edited by OmahaRumble; 01-23-2013 at 05:12 PM. Reason: only for 2008-2010 models
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 06:46 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 14
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
It seems that the Cervini's intake utilizes a similar reducing tube design... with the added benefit of making your hood scoops functional!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 07:49 PM
Unit453's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 764
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Feedback Score: 4 reviews
The Volant is a good design, which is why I went with it. I also didnt really notice a whole lot of difference. I liked the idea of an enclosed airbox.
__________________
Nick

2010 R/T:
Volant CAI
Diablo Sport Tune (91) CAI)
R1 Premium Drilled and Slotted Rotors
Dynomax VT Cat Back
Fastman Throttle Body
6.4 Shortys with mid pipes
Hankook Ventus V12 - 255/45/20



Proudly Served - U.S. Army - 1996-2004
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2013, 08:01 PM
Daves12R/T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 337
Photos: (1)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 108 Times in 74 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by 5.0 to SRT8 View Post
What is the difference between charger intake tube and challenger intake tube? I have heard this a few times before. Is it a noise dampening filter in the inlet tube? Is this on all challengers including the 2011+ SRT 392's? I would like to delete this also, if in fact it is on the newer SRT's.
I also went with the AFE pro dry filter and left the stock CAI in. Not a believer in open air intakes inside a hot engine compartment. The legmaker and other types like it would make the most sense if anyone wanted to do a CAI. The stock box is sealed and draws ambient air from the outside of the engine bay that's good enough for me, IMO a high flow panel filter is the way to go and that might even be a waste if they are already using high flow filters right from the factory. I'm a little sour on aftermarket open CAI after putting one on my 2011 5.0, really didn't do anything.



Sent from AutoGuide.com App
Challenger intake tube (with "goiter") and Charger intake tube comparison:
Attached Thumbnails
2011 R/T intake: Stock airbox best?-img_0841.jpg  
__________________
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2013, 05:40 AM
BigDaddyWiz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,184
Photos: (5)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
you may also want to look at the stack performance "bullet" fender pull...its got reductions in it made to force the air into the TB faster. it relocates the IAT sensor too. all of this is mentioned in rayzazoo's thread if you didnt see it. i have one on my car and it drastically lowers intake temps over the stock box in my case because i have the "lower radiator baffle" and SRT chin spoiler mods done to allow more cool air in.
__________________
09 Challenger R/T 6-speed w/ 3.92s

catch can
Hurst shifter w/Larry's mod
Jet 180* thermostat
HopNot total package
HopNot engine torque strut brace
M&H 275/50-17 Racemasters
Stack Performance Bullet CAI w/long IAT sensor
Email Tune from OST

PB: 13.5@104.5mph w/1.99 60' in +1286 DA (Corrected: 13.3@106mph)
16 total passes under my belt, 8 with drag radials
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2013, 06:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,476
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 263 Times in 201 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by rbrot47 View Post
OK, so from what I've read (with respect to the shorter tubes), it seems that there are some tq/hp gains that are realized in the upper RPM ranges, with a sacrifice to some throttle off the line and in the lower RPM range resulting from the initial pull of higher temp air from the shorter intakes.

It seems these gains (and losses) are mostly from a less restrictive filter, and a higher air flow rate through the intake tube, which aftermarket systems seem to have over the stock.

I'm curious if this increase in flow rate is just a result of the nature of the shorter tubing, meaning that it is easier to pull the air through the shorter distance from the engine compartment rather than draw it from the length of the full cold air tube beginning under the fender.

With this logic (and I'm aware that I could be completely mistaken), it seems that an intake design similar to the Volant, which has a shorter pipe, a high-flow filter and a (mostly) closed airbox that draws from below the front fender as well as through the grill (the airbox has an opening at the front) would be the best of both worlds.

Thoughts?
Sounds like you really want to get a Volant, I would rather get one with dyno-proven gains...
__________________
'12 Challenger SRT8 Pitch Black 6-speed, stripe delete, all options
-BT catch can, skip shift eliminator, Mopar intake, Hurst/Mopar short throw pistol grip, BB's resonater delete, Jet 180 t-stat, ceramic tint/clear bra/C-Quartz
13.56@104.38 DA 7170 - that's 12.33@114.45 corrected!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2013, 04:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 14
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
To throw more fuel on the fire...

What Does an Air Intake Resonator Do? | eHow.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to rbrot47 For This Useful Post:
TheQ! (01-25-2013)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > Performance Modifications > Bolt On's

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mid-West Owner List Venthos Mid-West 195 03-18-2014 06:06 PM
Mystery Grey IAT Sensor Connector - SOLVED! rayzazoo General Challenger Discussion 111 02-11-2014 04:38 PM
FOR SALE: 2011 Challenger R/T Classic 6 Speed Pilot5892 Vehicles For Sale/Wanted/Trade 2 12-04-2012 08:39 AM
SOLD: 2011 rt stock exhaust toxic13 Parts For Sale/Wanted/Trade 8 05-06-2012 05:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:54 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.