Timing chain failure on the Dodge Challenger - Page 242 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Featured Product
» Auto Insurance

» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion > Challenger Issues & Problems

ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2411 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 02:20 PM
Brent60's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 991
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 252
Thanked 379 Times in 204 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by USRWDV8 View Post
Yes, Brent, I think it's helpful to compare how fast the Hemi, and only the Hemi, is made to rev at a given speed (like about 70 since that's when failures seem to occur) depending on the model. This shows to those in denial that the models that don't fail operate differently from the Challengers, be it due to gearing/tire size or MDS programming. So the "Well, the Rams or Chargers are fine" argument is hogwash. I don't recall exactly what my Charger did, but its behavior was slightly different from my Challenger (I think it was way below 2,000 @ 65, for example). That's what they call a clue.

Personally, I don't think that 2,200 is killing the motor, just that this may be the sweet spot (so to speak) for harmful resonance. It does sound like wordplay, I know.
I get what your saying and I think you understand. It's not the smoking gun but it's a clue.

Sent from my HTC Rezound with the AutoGuide App.
__________________
Military Police - 2007-2012, Never Forget the Fallen
MODS: Roto Fab True CAI, Reso Delete w/ SRT Bottle Mids, Skip Shift Delete, Lock pick w/ Back up Cam, 392 Engine Covers Rebadged 345.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Brent60 For This Useful Post:
USRWDV8 (12-26-2012)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2412 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 02:24 PM
19johned53's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,946
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 828
Thanked 809 Times in 523 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by Brent60 View Post
Go back and read its a comparison of a 5.7 ram and Challenger.




No its not getting side track its people being one minded. When I brought up the RPMs it was to give some sort of actual number. Instead of the guessing that keeps going on. It's a V8 that kicks in to 4 cylinder and at 2000 RPM that can create a perfect resonance/vibration to mess things up. I don't care about your prior four cylinder cars we are talking about a challenger. Remember companies cut corners this could have been something R&D didn't catch.
Don't see any help there.

A Challenger and Charger with the same motor, same gearing, turns the same rpm. Major difference is that there appears to be many more TC's that fail in the Challenger.

I guess I'm not following your "help"
__________________
2010 RT "Classic" Automatic

Pietro wants to know if you have failures/issues/questions about your timing chain: pietro.gorlier@chrysler.com



Updated parts
53022316AC: timing chain
53022243AF: cam sprocket
53022317AC: crank sprocket
4893429AA: TC guide
53022338AB: oil control solenoid
53022115AH: TC tensioner
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2413 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 02:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 265
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
OK so I know we have seen a report of a hemi charger tc failure in this thread but I have googled for a tc failure in the 09+ 5.7 RAMs and have found nothing. Has this happened to the rams?

Don't know if this has been covered in this thread yet. I've been following it but really don't feel like going through 244 pages to maybe find an answer

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using AutoGuide.Com Free App
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2414 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 03:26 PM
sublime 781's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 490
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I agree with the resonance theory to a point.
you are assuming that every one drives 70 mph,2100 rpm and that is the sweet spot for resonance
how can you eliminate all other models based on that??
the guy with the RAM lives in Texas and runs 80 all the time at 2100 rpm.
the Charger cruises at 2100 rpm at 75 mph
the 300 might be 62mph
personally driving either car Charger or Challenger I rarely cruise above 60 but thats just me.
the above numbers are for reference only. Do you know where we might be able to find the final drive ratios for the above vehicles??
it might shed some light on this issue
my point is with all the other uses of this engine noone has ever cruised at 2100 rpm long enough to blow it up?? the failures are almost non existant on other uses
there has to be some other contributing factor
__________________
2007 dodge charger Sublime 0781/1500
2010 Furious Fuchsia RT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2415 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 04:20 PM
Brent60's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 991
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 252
Thanked 379 Times in 204 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
The reason I used 70 was it seemed like a usual average of these failures.

The Ram I used was a stock SLT with stock 20s and stock 3.55s.

To the guy that can't grasp the concept of resonance go Google it or take a class.

Sent from my HTC Rezound with the AutoGuide App.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2416 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 04:20 PM
mjb4450's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tucson (but it's a dry heat!)
Posts: 1,414
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 434 Times in 239 Posts
Feedback Score: 4 reviews
Originally Posted by 19johned53 View Post
A Challenger and Charger with the same motor, same gearing, turns the same rpm. Major difference is that there appears to be many more TC's that fail in the Challenger.
Except that several current and previous Charger owners have stated that the MDS operated differently than their Challengers. Less often and at different engine loads/RPM. Add that to what Brent60 is saying and there is valid info there.
__________________




MSgt, USAF, Ret. 1977-2001
Crew Chief A7D, A37A, A10A

Last edited by mjb4450; 12-26-2012 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mjb4450 For This Useful Post:
Brent60 (12-26-2012), USRWDV8 (12-26-2012)
  #2417 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 04:28 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Brooklyn Park MN
Posts: 808
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 48
Thanked 89 Times in 71 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by Brent60 View Post
The reason I used 70 was it seemed like a usual average of these failures.

The Ram I used was a stock SLT with stock 20s and stock 3.55s.

To the guy that can't grasp the concept of resonance go Google it or take a class.

Sent from my HTC Rezound with the AutoGuide App.
Wheel size would also be critical, If somebody bought larger aftermarket wheels it would move the resonance up to a proportionately higher speed. It would be interesting to know if the people that had the broken chains all had "stock" wheels.
__________________
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2418 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 04:45 PM
sublime 781's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 490
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by mjb4450 View Post
Except that several current and previous Charger owners have stated that the MDS operated differently than their Challengers. Less often and at different engine loads/RPM. Add that to what Brent60 is saying and there is valid info there.


so that would make it a programming issue, not a parts issue
as the parts will obviously last over 100,00 miles based on the mileage on other applications
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2419 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 04:48 PM
Brent60's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 991
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 252
Thanked 379 Times in 204 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I believe it's something with the tune.

Sent from my HTC Rezound with the AutoGuide App.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2420 (permalink)  
Old 12-26-2012, 05:14 PM
raVenX's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Off the rails on a crazy train
Posts: 3,535
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 250 Times in 76 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
When trying to figure out why the 300, Charger and Ram are not being affected like the Challenger is, think of it this way. Take four ounces of water an fill a small size wine glass. Wet your finger and ride it around the rim of the glass to make it sing. Now, take another four ounces of water and put it into a medium size wine glass, and do it again to a large size wine glass. Now run your fingers around the rims. Three different sounds emerge. The one thing different about the 300, Charger and Ram when compared to the Challenger is height, width and weight. Small, medium and large wine glasses. The harmonics may only be affecting the Challenger because it is in that range where the 300, Charge and Ram might be high or low of the range being of a different size. That's why the harmonics theory carries the most weight, but coupled with other factors that must be present.

Now, the four factors that I outlined a few posts back, i.e., (1) an aging timing chain (40,000+ miles); (2) high RPMs (2,300-2,500 RPM range); (3) sustained RPMs (in the 2,300-2,500 RPM range); and (4) MDS engaged, will create some kind of engine harmonics that resonate throughout the engine and is what is most likely causing the timing chain to begin its fatal wobble out of control. If any of the four factors are missing, the harmonics change and thus pulls the engine out of a danger zone and harms way. There certainly can be more factors that we have not yet identified, but these are the ones known so far which have not changed for some time. Just a theory but it is the one that make the most sense so far, to me anyway. Your mileage may vary.

I'll leave it you all to come to your own conclusions.
__________________

Last edited by raVenX; 12-27-2012 at 02:47 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion > Challenger Issues & Problems

Tags
failure, problems, timing chain

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 Challenger Information Thread ResumeSpeed General Challenger Discussion 1299 04-17-2014 05:46 AM
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 ResumeSpeed 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 36 11-28-2012 03:44 AM
2013 Dodge Challenger ResumeSpeed General Challenger Discussion 8 09-02-2012 08:26 AM
New Dodge Challenger Racing jacket- large treyb Parts For Sale/Wanted/Trade 1 08-22-2012 02:14 PM
2012 5th Annual LX & Beyond Nationals (OH) July 21-22 Turbobuckeye Mid-West 29 07-23-2012 04:50 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.