Timing chain failure on the Dodge Challenger - Page 79 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Featured Product
» Auto Insurance

» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion > Challenger Issues & Problems

ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #781 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 06:40 AM
HemiEd's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 417
Photos: (11)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by sitedrifter View Post
There are some serious voodoo theories going on here. The are quite interesting especially the one about the Challenger having more aggressive factory programming done to the PCM.
Do you have any idea what it might be? I personally think it is most stressed at the transition time, but that is not what the owners of the failed timing chains have said.


Oh, I found a document I had on file here at work, that may be appropriate for a certain poster in this thread. See attachment.
Attached Thumbnails
Timing chain failure on the Dodge Challenger-hurtfeelings.pdf  
__________________
09 R/T 28J, built 8-7-08, K&N CAI, catch can, SRT scoops, struts, springs, 70 R/T stripes, SRT wheels and tires. <img src=http://i55.tinypic.com/21d4ks1.jpg border=0 alt= />
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #782 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 07:34 AM
KayTar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 136
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
This has me worried now.
Which is more common auto challengers or manual challengers?


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
__________________
2010 Challenger Classic R/T
6 speed Airaid CAI
Pypes Violator Cat-back w/ JBA longtubes
Reply With Quote
  #783 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 07:43 AM
HemiEd's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 417
Photos: (11)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by KayTar View Post
This has me worried now.
Which is more common auto challengers or manual challengers?


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
So far, everything I have read has been 09 and 10 auto Challengers running on MDS.
Reply With Quote
  #784 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 08:04 AM
rt2010mm's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 20
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Just to let everyone know, I had this happen at 38000 miles, 2010 R/T Auto. Driving on the freeway and engine shuts off.

I have the Lifetime Warranty and it IS covered. They changed heads, cylinders, the infamous "timing chain", the whole works. Basically rebuilt my engine, and just got it back a couple days ago. Been just a little over a month, and works fine now. I plan on buying the Diablo programmer and shutting the MDS off with all the other perks, because I'm afraid this will happen again at around 80,000 miles. Don't really care about the mileage since my company pays for my gas, and this is my daily driver.

I brought up the Manley timing chain to the dealer when they first told me it was the timing chain that broke, and they said they wouldn't install it only because IF that broke, it would cause the same damage but wouldn't be under the lifetime warranty since it's not their product. damn!
Reply With Quote
  #785 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 08:23 AM
Hal H's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,577
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 114 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by outflyin View Post
My auto turns 2200 rpm at 70 mph. Seems like I've read comments on the forum about the manual transmissions having a lower rpm than the autos at highway speeds. Since these failures are occuring at this speed, the rpm difference could be a factor.
@ 70mph, the 6-speeds run ~ 1,650-1,700rpm, so its not a big difference in the scheme of things.
The 3.73/18" or 3.91/20" combo is virtually identical, as the 3.91 setup uses a taller tire and the overall ratio ends up being the same.
[18" = 715.8 revs/mi vs. 20" = 703.2 revs/mi]

When going up grades/ passes, you'll be @ 2,200-2,300rpm in 5th, as being at 5-6K' altitude and up a 5-6% grade, 6th gear is too tall for those situations.
__________________
2009 R/T 27J pkg (6 speed MT) ordered 7/17/08, built 10/23/08, home on 11/13/08

Reply With Quote
  #786 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 09:49 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
A few years back I had to replace the heads on a 02 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 4.7L. that I had. The Chain that turned the OHC was twice as beefy as the timing chain in the 5.7's

It baffles me as to why the engineers would put such a spindly timing chain into an engine with more HP
Attached Thumbnails
Timing chain failure on the Dodge Challenger-cam.jpg  

Last edited by dodge junkie; 08-03-2012 at 09:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #787 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 11:13 AM
HemiEd's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 417
Photos: (11)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by dodge junkie View Post
A few years back I had to replace the heads on a 02 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 4.7L. that I had. The Chain that turned the OHC was twice as beefy as the timing chain in the 5.7's

It baffles me as to why the engineers would put such a spindly timing chain into an engine with more HP
If you read the whole thread, it is pretty well covered. It is a space problem, due to the additional hardware for the VVT IIRC.

There was at least one post showing that the Camaro motor uses virtually the same size chain on their similar system.

My MDS is going off with my predator tomorrow. I haven't used it in over a year, so I will have to learn how to turn it off. I hate it though, gas is 4.25 a gallon up here but I don't want the thing to break.
Reply With Quote
  #788 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 11:21 AM
USRWDV8's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Greater Los Angeles
Posts: 2,278
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 1,706
Thanked 522 Times in 364 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by dodge junkie View Post
It baffles me as to why the engineers would put such a spindly timing chain into an engine with more HP
Engineer proposes; accountant disposes. Nothing new. This said, and all please bear in mind that I never even stayed at the same Holiday Inn as Chet Herbert, I think that sometimes it can be more a matter of resonance and natural frequency than pure part strength. And it's possible that, say, 2,200 rpm, or 2,275 rpm, or whatever, happen to create a destructive resonance that would never take place at even slightly higher or lower rpms, or with larger or smaller chains/tensioners. You'd think that this kinda thing would come up in testing, especially when as common as highway speed cruising, but maybe they don't put 40,000 miles on their mules doing one specific test.

@ rt2010mm: 38K is right at the average mileage for the failure, going by the numbers listed by raVenX. MDS delete via Predator seems like a good idea. At this point it's still a theory, though, except for a know-it-all or two.
Reply With Quote
  #789 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 11:32 AM
HemiEd's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 417
Photos: (11)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by USRWDV8 View Post
And it's possible that, say, 2,200 rpm, or 2,275 rpm, or whatever, happen to create a destructive resonance that would never take place at even slightly higher or lower rpms, or with larger or smaller chains/tensioners. You'd think that this kinda thing would come up in testing, especially when as common as highway speed cruising, but maybe they don't put 40,000 miles on their mules doing one specific test.

that is as good of a theory as any, hadn't thought of that one.

I used to fly H-34s made out of magnesium, and if the right vibration was set up on landing, they would go into "ground resonance" and basically implode.
Reply With Quote
  #790 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 11:42 AM
19johned53's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,522
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 105 Times in 76 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
A few years back there was a thread on how Chrysler tested their engines for 200k of "durability".

I believe that it was stated that if the engine would "live" for 200k of testing, that 95% of production engines would achieve the same mileage.

The other 5% couldwould fail under certain conditions, and that would be acceptable.

So, I'm sure that Chrysler has some long term test engines with results published in house, but we don't know the test parameters, and what did fail...........and when.

Everyone scowls at that little timing chain, but it seems to hold up to WOT conditions for the 5.7 and the 6.4, and all manual cars?????????

Not a soul on this board has posted that his chain broke during a WOT condition......only cruising at about 70, MDS "on", and then BANG.
__________________
2010 RT "Classic" Automatic
Options: (28M); Electronics Convenience Group; Power Sunroof; and the best $225 option in the world: Detonator Yellow Clear Coat


Did your Timing Chain/Tensioner Break? Check this:
http://www.challengertalk.com/forums...failure-97559/
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion > Challenger Issues & Problems

Tags
failure, problems, timing chain

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 Challenger Information Thread ResumeSpeed General Challenger Discussion 1277 05-10-2013 06:20 PM
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 ResumeSpeed 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 36 11-28-2012 03:44 AM
2013 Dodge Challenger ResumeSpeed General Challenger Discussion 8 09-02-2012 08:26 AM
New Dodge Challenger Racing jacket- large treyb Parts For Sale/Wanted/Trade 1 08-22-2012 02:14 PM
2012 5th Annual LX & Beyond Nationals (OH) July 21-22 Turbobuckeye Mid-West 29 07-23-2012 04:50 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.