![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Challenger Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Dodge Challenger News This section contains news and important information about the new Dodge Challenger. Important site news will also be posted in this section. Only Administrators can start topics in this section. (Dodge Challenger News) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
IL Insider: Dodge Challenges Reports of Challenger Production
Date posted: 05-15-2006 AUBURN HILLS, Mich. — Despite Web site reports that an auto supplier is working on components for the production version of the Dodge Challenger, the automaker is still studying whether the retro car makes good business sense, Inside Line has learned. The muscle-car Web site claimed that the Challenger was on track as a 2008.5 model. "They don't know what they are talking about," Chrysler spokesman Jason Vines told IL. "There has been no official approval, and I should know — I'm on the product strategy team that gives the green light. We are doing the business case on that [the Challenger] and the Imperial. "What we have done is reached out to suppliers and asked them for costs. It doesn't mean the car has the green light." However, Vines said the decision on the Challenger will be "fast" and should be handed down by the end of the year. The four-passenger Challenger concept was one of the show stoppers in Detroit this past January. The rear-wheel-drive concept version of the muscle car is powered by a 425-horsepower 6.1-liter Hemi engine linked to a six-speed manual transmission. The concept is patterned after the initial 1970 model, the one that is most sought after by collectors. What this means to you: Don't jump the gun on the production Challenger. The powers that be at the Chrysler Group are still mulling this one over.
__________________
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: NO "official approval"...
__________________
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: NO "official approval"...
Originally Posted by HEMEEE
You got that right!! I only want the truth,..all else is rumors! Thanks for the heads-up!!
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: NO "official approval"...
I'm tired of waiting damnit. Let me know if I need to wait, or I'm gonna get a Charger SRT
__________________
1995 Jeep Wrangler YJ (20k miles) 2006 Dodge Durango SLT 2010 Dodge Challenger 392 SRT8 Next? www.LeiterPhoto.com |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: NO "official approval"...
Corporate and Fast in the same paragraph? Thats the same as Army Intelligence.
Last edited by JustACelt : 05-15-2006 at 11:02 PM. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: NO "official approval"...
man i feel as though dcx is playing head games with us. one week an article comes out saying its pretty much a go, next week an article like this comes out shooting it down.
i feel that they know they will make it, however i guess its policy to shoot down such rumors so that they dont lose credibility for future products and they can have all the glory when they announce production dates. the only thing we can do is keep emailing them. GM gets 300 emails per day (so they say) about the camaro, lets keep the challenger emails going too. |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MOPAR Set To Invade "The Strip" At Las Vegas Motor Speedway | Mr.DJ | General Discussion | 0 | 03-23-2006 07:25 PM |
| Vee-Dub's "Un-Pimp My Ride" Commercials. | WildBillTX | Off-Topic Discussion | 3 | 03-14-2006 12:40 AM |
| Remove "Challenger" From the Rear Quarter Panel. | M3SMG02 | General Discussion | 9 | 02-01-2006 07:58 PM |
| Will the new Challenger's ECM be based on a "Speed Density" type system | Wild Monkey | General Discussion | 5 | 01-26-2006 06:16 PM |
| Media - "VIDEO" + photos Edmunds preview | EVERRET | Picture/Media/Art Post | 13 | 01-09-2006 11:35 PM |
|