![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Challenger Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Discussion This section contains general discussion about the new Dodge Challenger concept. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 4100lbs !!!!??? Why is this thing so damn heavy??
being a pretty heavy car and pretty big it should ride pretty good.BTW, Chrysler can`t give us all of the goodies the 1st or 2nd year. They always leave room for improvements so that people keep buying them. I`m pretty sure they may even have a supercharger on possibly a T/a challenger ,a bigger motor,and chrome wheels by the time I buy mine in april/may of 2009. I`ve waited 20 years to purchase a RWD musclecar from dodge so I can wait just a little longer so I can pay cash for it[I hate payments]
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 4100lbs !!!!??? Why is this thing so damn heavy??
btw,I don`t plan to take it to the track much and hopefully it will run high 12`s w/o supercharger .I just hope they can work on the gas mileage some because I`d like to drive it everyday.I`d love to see a 6.4 6 speed supercharged with available MDS and 25 mpg.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 4100lbs !!!!??? Why is this thing so damn heavy??
Originally Posted by Cuda340
YES, the block better be siamesed so i can stroke and bore that sucker to a 440. I wonder what the gas guzzlers gona be for a 6.4 im afraid to ask...yikes
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 4100lbs !!!!??? Why is this thing so damn heavy??
Originally Posted by GLHSHELBY
I was just going to suggest a T/A Challenger, and what equipment it would have. It would NOT have a higher HP V8 in it. Here's what I suggest: Hi Output V6, the new 4.0L, with at least 300 HP. Good Suspension, "Baby" Brembos F & R. Great Car for the Twisties. Lighter 6 Speed Manual, 5 Speed AutoStick Lighter Car overall, say, all up weight at 3600 lbs. Minimally optioned car, for the Kids. Lower price, say, 30K, or upper 20's (better) Great T/A Graphics and Color Choices. Hmmmm...? LJB PS: Some of you might recall Me suggesting this way back in prototye days last year. What I was shooting for was NOT a "Secretary Special." Not that I have anything against "Office Assistants", esp if they're Pretty... |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 4100lbs !!!!??? Why is this thing so damn heavy??
Everyones going to be expecting this car to be fast, especially faster than the charger because its a coupe. But since it weighs the same as a Charger , no thanks, id rather keep the sleeper appearance of my R/t and mod the hell out of the engine to make it an srt8 chally killer
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 4100lbs !!!!??? Why is this thing so damn heavy??
I still maintain Dodge should let the T/A version, if they build one, to be a lightweight handler, just like it's SCCA forebearers.
Me, I'll buy one of the heavy cruisers, a la SRT8, loaded. But, that's ME. Give the Kids, and the twistie addicts, their lightweight, V6 alternative. It would be a nice car, easy on the Gas & Pocketbook. We're all not made of money. LJB ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Didnt Chrysler say the same thing about the Charger? | BigDaddyWiz | Off-Topic Discussion | 18 | 02-17-2006 02:56 PM |
| Artwork - I took care of the length and weight thing.... | allhemi | Picture/Media/Art Post | 11 | 01-28-2006 06:24 AM |
| Challenger not so heavy... | TDB7117 | General Discussion | 7 | 01-23-2006 09:05 PM |
| Here's one thing that no one has mentioned... | Yankee | General Discussion | 13 | 01-22-2006 06:44 AM |
| QFA and just start making the darn thing already.... | AWDave | Off-Topic Discussion | 3 | 01-08-2006 09:36 AM |
|