![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Challenger Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Discussion This section contains general discussion about the new Dodge Challenger concept. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
I think this was discussed before here. Probably in the OT forum.
Someone actually posted all the ratings of the motors tested as well. Was an interesting show.
__________________
98 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Coupe 09 SRT Challenger on order "Hey hey I want to be a rock star" |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
Not sure what they did, but someone was smoking crack.
No way the Hemi, or any of the other motors would put out that kind of power, if stock. Stock meaning stock jetting in the stock carbs, stock wires blah blah. RoostKing... |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
Originally Posted by RoostKing
I agree. The SRT engineers have stated that the 6.1 Hemi puts out the same power as the 426 street Hemi. This bears out in comparable quarter mile times and dyno tests. (The 6.1 SRT Chargers are consistently recording 385 rear wheel hp).
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
It is not that difficult today to get upwards of 600hp on yesterdays 425hp engines. The reciprocating asemblies are lighter, the cams are better, the engines seal-up better, and the flow work available for cylinder heads and intake manifolds are better. And this does not require Nitrous!
__________________
Bob The (NASCAR Engine) Builder |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
Originally Posted by BGuerity
The difference between 600 HP and 880 HP, as the show stated they got out of the hemi, are HUGE. Plus these were supposed to be stock(and i take that too mean in the original configuration they came from the factory, in say 1970)
RoostKing... |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
The show's parameters were:
No "ringers". Sixty thousandths max overbore. Stock heads & intake. Compression ratios were stated. Carbs had to be the same "type" as originally installed. Camshafts could be no better than "blueprint" specs. With that being said, there's a lot of room for improvement here. Ported heads and manifolds. Camshaft actully installed is anyone's guess. There's no telling what was done to the carbs, jetting, ect. Crankshaft was attached to the engine dyno. Not sure about accessories. The horsepower numbers were: 1962 Chevy 409 made 406hp. 1963 Pontiac 421 Superduty managed 423hp I believe. The '65 Ford 427 touched 637hp. The late 60's Chevy 427 ended up right at 500hp, give or take 5. The 1966 Hemi made 820hp. Their line was that these engines represented what you might have found in a "highly tuned street machine" during the 60's. They didn't specify just how much "tuning" each engine had. ![]()
__________________
Current Mopars: 2006 Dodge Charger SRT8, 1997 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0L, 1986 Dodge Van 318, 1977 Dodge Aspen R/T 318, 1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340. Beyond the Palace, Hemi-powered drones scream down the Boulevard. Last edited by 340EBody : 12-05-2007 at 11:23 AM. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: 426 Hemi
I dont care how big of cam you have, if you cant flow the air/fuel, and with stock manifolds and head, your not going to get to 820hp. IMO
I could be wrong I suppose, i just dont see it happening. Were they running alcohol LOL RoostKing.. |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HEMI and HEMI Jr. PICS | ChriSRT-4 | Off-Topic Discussion | 3 | 05-30-2006 05:39 PM |
|