6.1 vs 6.4 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
General Challenger Discussion This section contains general discussion about the Dodge Challenger. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#1 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:28 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
6.1 vs 6.4

Looking to purchase a challenger that i will eventually mod out. Is there much difference between 6.1 models & 6.4 models that i will benefit from in the long run? any info would help
erictaf857 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:35 AM
Senior Member
 
MoparSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 462
Thanks: 40
Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Skype™ to MoparSpeed
If it were me, I'd go with the 6.4L 392. Tuning has just recently become available and that was their only real drawback.. You're getting 50 extra horses compared to a 6.1L and a nicer interior to boot.

A used 6.1 will be cheaper though of course.

2009 Brilliant Black R/T
1987 Camaro IROC-Z
1966 Chevy C10 Fleetside
-------------------------
1/4 mile: 13.08 @107.40 mph w/2.04 60' on RSA's
-Mopar CAI - BT Catch Can - Diablosport Intune 93 CAI Tune - Jet 180* Thermostat - 392 IAT sensor
-Eibach Sportline Springs - Painted Calipers - McGard Lugs
-Amber Fogs - LED Tag Light - LED reverse lights - Red LED map lights - Tinted Side Markers
MoparSpeed is offline  
#3 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:41 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
thanx for the info man pretty set on the 6.4 if i can find one for the right price lol
erictaf857 is offline  
#4 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 12:44 AM
Senior Member
 
MoparSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 462
Thanks: 40
Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Skype™ to MoparSpeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by erictaf857 View Post
thanx for the info man pretty set on the 6.4 if i can find one for the right price lol
I hear you, I might be upgrading to one myself eventually, that is if I can come to trade in my current baby, which probably won't happen, I'm pretty attached to her

But the 392 is a fantastic car, can't go wrong with one.
MoparSpeed is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MoparSpeed For This Useful Post:
grimmysnr (12-10-2012)
#5 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:00 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
another question. doesnt make much sense but i keep hearing the r/t stock is actually faster then the srt... but ive heard it from a guy whos brother owns an r/t lol
erictaf857 is offline  
#6 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:20 AM
Senior Member
 
MoparSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 462
Thanks: 40
Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Skype™ to MoparSpeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by erictaf857 View Post
another question. doesnt make much sense but i keep hearing the r/t stock is actually faster then the srt... but ive heard it from a guy whos brother owns an r/t lol
There's no truth in that, now an R/T with an automatic transmission could beat someone with a 6-speed SRT who couldn't drive worth a damn. In general, your auto cars are just going to be faster, but the 6-speed is always gonna be more fun. Not saying a 6-speed can't beat an auto, with a good driver anything is possible.

Both head to head, with no driver error, the SRT will win 10/10 times. Now with some bolt ons (Intake/Tune/Exhaust/Headers), the R/T starts to catch up to the 6.1L, but without major modifications, the 392 is out of it's league.
I still say the the R/T is the best "bang for your buck" Is it worth the $10k more for the 6.1L, upgraded suspension and Brembo brakes the 08-10 SRT offers? that's up to you to decide.

Again, this is what sets the 392 apart, it's in a league of it's own.

Hope this helps
MoparSpeed is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MoparSpeed For This Useful Post:
erictaf857 (12-10-2012)
#7 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:30 AM
Senior Member
 
princesspaola21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 576
Thanks: 11
Thanked 52 Times in 39 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I've had an RT and I've had a 392... I wouldn't trade back!


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com App

princesspaola21 is offline  
#8 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:43 AM
Senior Member
 
MoparSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 462
Thanks: 40
Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Skype™ to MoparSpeed
I originally chose an R/T because of the price, and the heritage. There was no SRT in 1970, and that R/T badge is a throwback, it's just classic.
MoparSpeed is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MoparSpeed For This Useful Post:
OmahaRumble (12-10-2012), Triz (12-10-2012)
#9 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:45 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
used srt vs new r/t? not planning on reselling
erictaf857 is offline  
#10 (permalink) Old 12-10-2012, 01:47 AM
Senior Member
 
MoparSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 462
Thanks: 40
Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Skype™ to MoparSpeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by erictaf857 View Post
used srt vs new r/t? not planning on reselling
If price isn't an issue, I'd get a used SRT
MoparSpeed is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MoparSpeed For This Useful Post:
erictaf857 (12-10-2012)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6.1 vs 6.4 STRAIGHT8 6.1L (2008 - 2010) 83 10-21-2014 03:15 PM
Goodbye 6.1 - Hello 6.4 !!! GNorSRT8 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 42 12-17-2012 08:44 PM
6.4 shortblock with 5.7 parts 340party Performance Modifications 14 11-20-2012 02:04 PM
Supercharged 6.1 Hemi? Cuda340 General Challenger Discussion 6 03-09-2007 10:26 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome