6.1 vs 6.4 - Page 2 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Featured Product
» Auto Insurance

» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

General Challenger Discussion This section contains general discussion about the Dodge Challenger. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)

ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 12:06 AM
Isaac-1's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 393
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 43 Times in 36 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
A lot depends on your long term goals, these days unless you run into a heck of a deal a used 2010 6.1 SRT8 is going to be about $9,000 less than a similar mileage used 2011 6.4 SRT8, with that much money you can buy a good positive displacement supercharger and put out 50-100 HP more than the 6.4 (depending on how safe of tune you opt for).
__________________
2010 Plum Crazy SRT8 with Manual Transmission-------

Mods list: K&N Typhoon CAI, Skip Shift Eliminator , Petty Strut Tower Brace, Diablo Predator 91CAI tune, License Plate backup camera with Lockpick V2, mini spare tire and adapter, Moroso Catch Can, some BT bling, 3rd brake pulser, Larry's mod Hurst shifter, coming soon Web Electric Sequential tail lights and LED under door lights
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 12:11 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
yeah im eventually going to supercharger it. is compression too high on the 6.1s and 6.4s for a solid supercharger on the stock motors?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 05:04 AM
Modern Muscle's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,241
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by erictaf857 View Post
yeah im eventually going to supercharger it. is compression too high on the 6.1s and 6.4s for a solid supercharger on the stock motors?

If you are looking for long term reliability then both motors can handle about 8lbs of boost.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 05:15 AM
EDDIE T's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y
Posts: 827
Photos: (10)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
get the 6.1 there is options to stroke and bore to a 392 426 440 and then s/c. Or have the 6.1 forged,heads and cam and your golden!
__________________
09 SRT8 FORGED HEMI ORANGE HURST 6 SPEEDSHORT THROW,HI FLOW CATS,ZOOMERS,BLOWN, AJ TUNE,180 TSTAT PROCHARGED STAGE 2- D-1- 14 psi 700 hp SO MUCH MORE
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 05:24 AM
conceptmachine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 846
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 77
Thanked 68 Times in 59 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
with the 6.4 supercharged with 8psi, people are getting just shy of 650HP. Throw in a couple bolt ons and you there. In an auto, with the right tires, that is a quick machine...really don't need it much quicker for street use... But thats up to you. Buy a cheap car wit nonworking motor...and drop in a 426 and supercharge. You'll need new tires every month. LOL
Have fun deciding
__________________
10' Toyota RAV4 green
12' Jeep Wrangler Artic edition lightblue
14' GT 500 silver and black
15' Dodge SRT Challenger 6.2 blue, green, orange or gold

11' GWE SRT Challenger - traded
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 06:46 AM
war machine xxl's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 163
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as the engine goes, the only difference between the 6.1 and 392 is the bore and stroke, correct?
__________________

2012 Challenger "345", Tremec 6-speed, maxed out on bolt ons.
NEXT: 392 stroker/ported heads/supercharger build....one month until completion
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 06:55 AM
IDMTfirefighter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,050
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 280 Times in 198 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
now that they are tunable the 6.4L is the way to go.
Warranty will be moot anyway if you mod it with FI
__________________


2009 Dodge // Challenger S/E--TorRed

Custom 9-11-01 nose badge | custom 3.5L hood badges | CAI | Hood pins | DIY engine bay dress up | MOPAR hood struts/pedal kit/fuel door | blacked out side mirrors | Under dash ambient light | Jones Full Boar exhaust | Cuda' style MOPAR hockey stick striping |

Honor God, Love your Woman, Defend your country!!!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 07:11 AM
SRT Wasp's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 601
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 44 Times in 35 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by princesspaola21 View Post
I've had an RT and I've had a 392... I wouldn't trade back!


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com App
Ditto


Sent from my iPhone using Autoguide
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 08:06 AM
chris1992's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pineville, LA
Posts: 2,413
Photos: (8)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
At the moment, the 6.1 is your best bet if you plan on going into the motor. But if you just want to slap a blower on and call it done, then the 6.4 would be the way to go.
__________________

Street tire PB: 12.64@109
New mod: SRT8 Brembo's

2009 Dodge Challenger R/T: 12.450 @ 107.640 MPH


Check some of my videos here:
YouTube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2012, 09:03 AM
The Chromer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago/Southwest Suburbs
Posts: 193
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Just traded in my 2011 R/T for a 2013 SRT8, no comparison, the statement that a stock R/T is faster than the 392 SRT8 is a false statement
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goodbye 6.1 - Hello 6.4 !!! GNorSRT8 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 42 12-17-2012 06:44 PM
6.4 shortblock with 5.7 parts 340party Performance Modifications 14 11-20-2012 12:04 PM
6.1 vs 6.4 STRAIGHT8 6.1L / 372ci (2008 - 2010) 74 10-31-2012 07:25 PM
Supercharged 6.1 Hemi? Cuda340 General Challenger Discussion 6 03-09-2007 08:26 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.