Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > Dodge Challenger Forum > General Challenger Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics (T) Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Challenger Discussion This section contains general discussion about the Dodge Challenger. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

ChallengerTalk.com is the largest Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Please Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 10:11 AM
425hpChargerSRT8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 5,647
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (1)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Originally Posted by Brucer41 View Post
Umm Santa, can I have the Challenger for Xmas pretty please? Oh, and make it a 6 speed too! While the numbers were close I think if the Challenger had a 6 speed it would have been closer or the snake may have been behind a little. The bad thing is that the Challenger was not using the 6.1 so as a head to head the Super Snake would probably eat the Challenger alive if it was the 6.1. But, I did like the video!
the 6.1 to 7.0 change is not really too much hp increase. The most power increases comes from the heads and cam, and in this case the blower. So it is possible with all of that on the 6.1 you can make the same power, but the real problem is that the 6.1 has no forged internals. Thats why many just up the cubes to either 392 (6.4) or 426 (7.0) while they are in the block
__________________
2009 Challenger SRT8 - Hemi Orange - 6 Speed - MyGig - Sound Group II

Current Mods:
Carbon Fiber Nose Emblem, Spoiler Badge,
Strut Covers, Plate Frame, & Door Sill Plates
HURST Shifter, Spec P-Trim Clutch


Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 10:46 AM
compcobra's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 93
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

stupid chally couldnt even take the trashing." oh oh its overheating" lol These guys built a 100.000 dollar challanger and its a turd. BTW I love cobras but not the shelby.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 02:28 AM
basil0o's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 69
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Originally Posted by compcobra View Post
stupid chally couldnt even take the trashing." oh oh its overheating" lol These guys built a 100.000 dollar challanger and its a turd. BTW I love cobras but not the shelby.
Hey you no one asked for your opinion so shut up!
__________________
2008 Black Challenger SRT8
(3834-6400)

Mods are:

1- Mopar intake
2- Headers kooks long tube
3- Zoomers cat-back system
4- Custom tune CMR
5- 180 stat
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:04 AM
compcobra's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 93
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Originally Posted by basil0o View Post
Hey you no one asked for your opinion so shut up!
wooooe friend. I am not bashing the challenger caz I love it, just the fact someone put 100 large into it and it didnt finish. sorry yo.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:08 AM
DinoMoparman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Live in TN back from Iraq!!!
Posts: 942
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Hey BasilOo dont let cpmpcobra get to you, it's not like it's Dodge's fault for it overheating but the tuners were the ones that made it so it should be looked at it from that perspective. And they did compare a 5 spd vs an auto and it still did pretty good overall. Plus that Challenger just looks better!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:16 AM
DinoMoparman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Live in TN back from Iraq!!!
Posts: 942
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Originally Posted by compcobra View Post
stupid chally couldnt even take the trashing." oh oh its overheating" lol These guys built a 100.000 dollar challanger and its a turd. BTW I love cobras but not the shelby.
What's wrong with the Shelby? I think they look pretty good I like them over the regular ones.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:32 AM
compcobra's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 93
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Originally Posted by DinoMoparman View Post
What's wrong with the Shelby? I think they look pretty good I like them over the regular ones.
I was not happy how ford brought shelby on board in late 05 after the new stang was already engineered buy SVT, they just bought his name for the car. It was a marketing ploy that turned out to be quite profitable. That super snake is msrp almost 80k but you wouldnt touch it for that, More like 100k. So dollar for dollar I would take that chally before the snake{stupid cobra has a solid diff}. Who knows, maybe it was some thing simple that malfuntioned on the dodge.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:40 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

So all in all, the Supersnake is a little faster, but the Challenger looks like more of a fun ride.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 09:06 AM
compcobra's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 93
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

Originally Posted by Repth View Post
So all in all, the Supersnake is a little faster, but the Challenger looks like more of a fun ride.
Me personally, I think the chally is really hurting for some wider tires? I have seen a few around and cant believe how skinny they are! I am sure a set of Nitto,s with some extra width would really help.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 02:01 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Greenville,SC
Posts: 12
Photos: (0)
iTrader: (0)
Re: 7.0 L, 725 hp, 713 lb-ft torque Challenger!!!

the shelby is nice but definately the challenger is a much better vehicle.Only ford people would want to take a trip in the stang,the challenger will be much more corfortable and a better driver
__________________
98 black 5.9 jeep GC
89 black dodge daytona shelby
86 black dodge omni glh-t
08 black dodge charger SE plus
71 black plymouth `Cuda 383
89 silver dodge daytona shelby[1 of 258]
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > Dodge Challenger Forum > General Challenger Discussion


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2