![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Challenger Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Discussion This section contains general discussion about the new Dodge Challenger concept. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Challenger not so heavy...
39 huh thast pretty heavy. i think the new mustang looks SAD!
__________________
1968 Dodge Charger|318 Stock| 1999 Chevy Camaro Z/28 M6 |MTI Clear Lid|K&N Filter|SLP Smooth Bellow|!GAGS|TSP Rumbler|PRO 5.0(LSS)|FTRA|NT555R's. 12.98 @ 109.9 2.052( ) 60ftComing Soon: QTP LongTubes HVMC|ORY Dual QTP Cutouts|Bilstein HD's|...More Later... MS3!!
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Challenger not so heavy...
Originally Posted by TDB7117
Yea,I agree the new shelby gt-500 looks really cool in person,...but.....it would be my 2nd choice as my favorite styled retro American new muscle coupe...new hemi challenger #1..... I'm counting on Dodge,not to change the production version of the challenger.
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Challenger not so heavy...
I was actually pretty excited about the Shelby GT500 when I read the spec sheet. There was no Challenger or Camaro on the horizon and the GT500 looked far better than a stock Mustang. Then I read it would weigh almost 4,000 lbs and suddenly it lost its appeal. A Challenger MIGHT get away with it, but a 4000 lb Mustang?
I still laugh when guys say a manufacturer should drop a V8 into a car with a 4 cylinder and think it will only weigh 100 lbs more. After you beef up the entire drivetrain and brakes and peripherals, you are going to add 3 or 400 lbs to that little. Now a shade-tree V8 conversion may only add the extra weight of the motor and tranny. Then they complain when the rest of the car doesn't hold up under the strain. ![]()
__________________
Just build it! |
||||||||||||||||||
|