The Meaner Rake - Page 2 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
General Challenger Discussion This section contains general discussion about the Dodge Challenger. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#11 (permalink) Old 01-13-2013, 05:16 PM
Senior Member
 
noz34me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: the Beautiful Shenandoah Valley, VA
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 0
Thanked 129 Times in 67 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
They did a great job on the new Challenger, but the '70-'74 was lower, wider, and more aggressive profile any way you look at it.
noz34me is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#12 (permalink) Old 01-13-2013, 09:03 PM
Senior Member
 
ZardozSpeakstoYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Garland, Texas
Posts: 398
Thanks: 19
Thanked 56 Times in 39 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdx.challenger View Post
It's not too high - your '72 is what a muscle car is all about. This is the reason that I won't lower my car.

It amuses me when Challenger owners who are older, claim to be hard-core old school, but insist on touchscreens & lowered cars.
Exactly damn right. Normally the guys with the slammed cars and the flat black (PRIMER COLORED) paintjobs were way too young to have remembered the real thing. Kinda like those guys you meet that graduated high school in 76 and said they were in the Nam. Now they are the same guys who think 22 inch black Foose wheels look great and dont realize 15 (or even 14) inch Cragers and Americans were the real thing. Old school muscle was always high in the back and sometimes in the front too and was usually the brightest darn color you could paint it. That purple Challenger is a great looking ride my friend.


ZardozSpeakstoYou
2012 Dodge Challenger R/T Classic 6 spd
1973 Dodge B-100 Tradesman Shorty No-Window Van
2005 Dodge 1500 Hemi Quadcab
2007 Harley Davidson FLHT

Last edited by ZardozSpeakstoYou; 01-13-2013 at 09:04 PM.
ZardozSpeakstoYou is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to ZardozSpeakstoYou For This Useful Post:
pdx.challenger (01-13-2013)
#13 (permalink) Old 01-13-2013, 09:26 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
 
tledoux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 163
Thanks: 52
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
The modern Challenger is a bit taller than the 70's E-bodies, at least in height. So it was easier to get a mean rake to the older car. I've lowered my 09 Challenger with BC Racing coilovers, and have the back end about 1/4" higher than the front, and it gives it a pretty good stance.




Last edited by tledoux; 01-13-2013 at 09:27 PM.
tledoux is offline  
#14 (permalink) Old 01-13-2013, 10:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Heywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 1,118
Thanks: 70
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I had mine at a Local Car Show. There were only 2 there. My 2010 and this nice 74.

They parked us side by side so people could get a better look at the differences between the old and new.

Hope it helps.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Challenger Show 1.JPG
Views:	213
Size:	436.9 KB
ID:	60354   Click image for larger version

Name:	Challenger Show 2.JPG
Views:	178
Size:	437.7 KB
ID:	60355  

Heywood is offline  
#15 (permalink) Old 01-13-2013, 10:34 PM
Premium Member
 
NewMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bensalem, Pa
Posts: 466
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonmandude View Post
By today's standards, my 72 was too high. But back in the day, I remember loving the look of high-boy Impalas and Econoline axeled Gassers.


my thoughts exactly
[IMG][/IMG]



2009 DWB Challenger S/E
Factory Style Rear Spoiler
Hood Struts
K & N Intake System
FlowMaster Dual Exhaust CatBack System
SRT Exhaust Tips
Factory Dual Exhaust Bumper Trim
WebElectic Sequential Taillights
Billet Technology Nose Badge
Blue Halo Driving Lights
Challenger Trunk Mat


If you're not turning around and looking at your car as you walk away, YOU OWN THE WRONG CAR!!!!
NewMuscle is offline  
#16 (permalink) Old 01-14-2013, 02:49 AM
vichris is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vichris For This Useful Post:
B-Digital (01-22-2013), Trimec (01-17-2013)
#17 (permalink) Old 01-14-2013, 05:07 AM
Senior Member
 
raceheart77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,108
Thanks: 217
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by vichris View Post
When I think of raked, this is what I envision as "correct".........


http://tonicfab.com/news/wp-content/.../07/cuda_3.jpg





.
And you are correct Sir... great shot!

2010 BB SRT8 STICK

Last edited by raceheart77; 01-14-2013 at 05:07 AM.
raceheart77 is offline  
#18 (permalink) Old 01-14-2013, 10:10 AM
Senior Member
 
ZardozSpeakstoYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Garland, Texas
Posts: 398
Thanks: 19
Thanked 56 Times in 39 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Now this is raked. Thunderbolt and Lightfoot. Trunk full of bunnies.

Last edited by ZardozSpeakstoYou; 01-14-2013 at 10:11 AM.
ZardozSpeakstoYou is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to ZardozSpeakstoYou For This Useful Post:
Trimec (01-17-2013)
#19 (permalink) Old 01-14-2013, 12:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 6,412
Thanks: 205
Thanked 425 Times in 326 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
So the big question for me is...can a modern Challenger get raked like that and make it work, or does it just look ridiculous? I don't mean so much jacked in the air, but just the rear higher than the front? I also would the angle do something weird with the toe behavior (make it uncorrectable or just plain flaky when it comes to any kind of suspension motion)?...not only front, but also rear now, given all that irs activity.

http://www.challengertalk.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic6929_4.gif

09 Challenger R/T automatic...4 tires, stick-on convex mirror, seats

It's not that I really needed 370 hp...but having 150+ hp riding shotgun at a moment's bidding w/o a 6000 rpm moonshot is what makes me feel like I'm in the right car for me. The roar of a v8 seals the deal!

The Google keyword is "ethanol-free gas". The truth is coming to light. Check out http://pure-gas.org/
randycat99 is offline  
#20 (permalink) Old 01-14-2013, 01:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Heywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 1,118
Thanks: 70
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by randycat99 View Post
So the big question for me is...can a modern Challenger get raked like that and make it work, or does it just look ridiculous? I don't mean so much jacked in the air, but just the rear higher than the front? I also would the angle do something weird with the toe behavior (make it uncorrectable or just plain flaky when it comes to any kind of suspension motion)?...not only front, but also rear now, given all that irs activity.
In lifting the back end with shackles/air shocks was more due to necessity and function.


Cornering was way different (as in cornering didn't really matter), but how were you able to put the widest wheels possible to handle the big torque and clear the fender wells?

Rim technology with offsets wasn't at the stage it is today. Tubbing the rear wasn't big and shortening the rear axle wasn't something many did or find shops to do it. Figure expense in there as well. The internet helps a lot today as well.

Today if you want to find out how and who can do it, it's just a mouse click away. World wide shipping. Back then you had to rely on what could be done locally.


The look? Well think back then of how the funny cars were marketed? Jungle Jim, Snowman, The Hawaiian Punch, Snake/ Mongoose,.... etc. Who didn't have a model of a funny car at one point back then and wanted their cars to look like that?? Luckly I grew up in this era and got to meet and see all these iconic cars and drivers run.

Things today are built to work Randycat99. The lawyers are now involved and with the way people sue over every little thing in the States, they have to CYA. Part is look, but priority is function and safety. Same reason they did it back in the day and we all had to modify the stance.

Just my thoughts on the subject.

Last edited by Heywood; 01-14-2013 at 01:37 PM.
Heywood is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old Gap vs New Gap on Torq Thrust Ms after front KW v1 install. 2Luke2 Wheels, Tires, Brakes, and Suspension 15 10-23-2012 09:48 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome