NOS, TURBO, SC, or STOCK???

[davidb]

WHEN I get the new Challenger, it must have 500-600Hp, one way or the other. I'll need a lot of advice from the good folks here at the forum, and a good place to set it up for me, if it's an aftermarket solution.

I've waited 32 years to get over the regret from selling my high school Challenger.

[davidb]

PS. At least 500-600HP. As much as I can get under the hood, keep it street legal, and have nothing protruding from said hood.

[squeek360]

being an old school muscle car guy with a recent addiction to boost..........gotta have some form of boost

[allhemi]

Originally Posted by E-Body

If I get the SRT8 and it's 500hp+ then I'd leave it mostly Stock

Anything less I may consider a S/C

I'm with you!

[AmericanMuscle]

Turbo and Challenger is an oximoron, they should never be used in the same sentence except "That Challenger blew the doors off that turbo honda!"

I have to say putting a Turbo on a Dodge Challengerr would be inhumane, disgusting, and indispicable. Youd have to go with a supercharger or naturally aspirated tuning to have a muscle car.

[Sr4tuner]

how bout a buick gnx then^

[blackarmy]

i love sticking with "there is no replacement for displacement". but id think about maybe putting a blower there after going all out on the stock 6.4 or 6.1 depending which is the highest

[redsled]

Leave the blowers to Ford...If it goes forced induction...go Turbo! It's more efficient than a blower and Chrysler is pretty famous for it's Turbo cars now . With all of the ones produced in the 80's and the SRT-4's fame...it's only natural to consider a hairdryer...

[Sr4tuner]

and 18 pounds sounds more inviting than 4
if you get what i mean

[r/t-youngster]

twin turbo

and nos