Sergio m. Ceo: Challenger cannot continue - Page 4 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums
Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum
 

» Featured Product
» Auto Insurance

» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

General Challenger Discussion This section contains general discussion about the Dodge Challenger. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)

ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2012, 09:43 PM
wyoming's Avatar
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SHOSHONI WYOMING
Posts: 1,593
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Keep the kb

Originally Posted by ceri View Post
I'd be more than happy to purchase an all electric car that puts out 400+ horsepower. Electric vehicles don't suffer from some of the same problems that combustion engines do. When you really think about it, having up to 7000 explosions happening every minute inside a small pressurized cylinder is about the dumbest method of linear motion we could come up with. It just happens to be the easiest and most economically feasible method we've got right now. Electrical vehicles have a ton of potential just waiting to be tapped as battery technology catches up. Someday we'll be installing a new 'positron inverter' instead of headers, or a beefed up linear regulator instead of a CAI, and pushing past the 1000 hp mark for the cost we put into getting 50 hp out of a combustion engine, with 90%+ energy efficiency from our solar paint and windstream scavengers. Or, if you need a family sedan, you buy the model with a power limiter that allows your stock battery to go 6 months without needing a single recharge.

These things are in the classrooms and laboratories right now. They're waiting on the chemists to make steps in battery technology to implement them. Imagine being able to sacrifice 100 miles of distance per charge to get 100 extra horsepower by winding a coil a little tighter without worrying about spinning a bearing from redlining. Or plugging in a diablo tuner and having the option to add 200 horsepower in 2 minutes. The Tesla Roadster and the Fisker Karma are just the baby steps into performance electric powered cars and they'll smoke a stock vette off the line. Heck they do 0-60 faster than a Z06 or a Viper for nearly the same price, and you won't even have to turn up the volume on the radio. The Tesla is already reportedly 88% efficient.

Don't be afraid of the future. Electric cars will be even more mod-friendly than what we've got today, and those mods will almost certainly be cheaper than buying forged pistons and crankshafts. Even more silly in perspective is bolting on superchargers trying our best to keep an ideal stoich ratio that only gives us 60% energy efficiency at best (maximum thermal efficiency of modern gasoline combustion engines).
I will keep my KB and Diablo tuner, thank you very much. The whine of a electric motor does not do it for me. I guess I will continue to live in the past and be happy with my in-efficient gas(E 85) Guzzler. I am not afraid of electric cars, but I do have concerns about our future.
__________________
2008 SRT8 HPP 002 SUPERBIRD, FIRST HPP SUPERBIRD BUILT FOR 200MPH+, Spanking Times Built 870 RWHP Street Tune on E-85, 1/4 mile 10.962 @ 128.92, 190.9 MPH Mojave Mile
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2012, 11:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 440
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
CRX Specs 88-91

CRX specs 88-91...mpg 49 to 52. pretty darn good...options 0..curb weight 2100 lbs
Toyota Prius 2013...mpg 48 to 51 pretty darn good...options power everything nav, tc anti lock brakes, hid headlights, and power steering and power windows
weight 3064lbs using some simple math if the prius lost 1000lbs which is 33 percent of its total weight it would improve the mpg by roughly the same amount adding 17mpg and bringing its average to 68 city 65 highway. Which is about half a mpg per year.

I will not even bring up the fact that the electric vehicles have a mpg price break down that usually is about 100mpg.
__________________
I live my life a quarter mile at a time. Nothing else matters: not the mortgage, not the store. Not the team For those 13 seconds or less, I'm free." -Win Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 07:48 AM
CrazySRT8Guy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: near Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 197
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by GSMC View Post

You bet!! The new Challenger will get 45 MPG in 2015 thanks to current technology!!!....
Yes......this will be the new way......back to front wheel drive 4 bangers......I wonder if they will bring back the Omni and K-Cars? LOL.
__________________
2012 Challenger SRT8
Pitch Black
Silver Stripes
6 Speed
430N Premium Sound
Sunroof
245/255

2012 Dodge Ram 1500
Pitch Black
Regular Cab/Short Box
5.7 Hemi
2 Wheel Drive
20" Wheels



Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CrazySRT8Guy For This Useful Post:
#32 of 1100 (11-12-2012)
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:22 AM
Big D's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 356
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 43 Times in 13 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Great discussion....i do think technology, Superchargers, turborchargers and further fuel tuning with the use of lighter weight components will squeeze more mileage and performance. Also the micro (european style) vehicles will help with CAFE ratings. American engineering is the best of the best and we will come up with a solution. We are a long way from the 55MPG issue and things can change. Remember when we had no internet and cell phones...and look now how much more productive (or stressed) we are since these things have been developed. Hybrids will be better developed to handle city driving when engine load is not needed.....this is already here
__________________
2012 Challenger SRT8
2010 Harley Street Glide
2009 Harley XR 1200
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Walker Co. Alabama
Posts: 218
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I remember when the third brakelight news broke. If everybody believed Hot Rod, Car Craft,
and Motor Trend you'd have thought the world was coming to an end.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Freddy For This Useful Post:
PlumCrazy09 (11-14-2012)
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 12:34 PM
pdx.challenger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: ORegon
Posts: 3,108
Photos: (1)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 68 Times in 57 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
I remember when the third brakelight news broke. If everybody believed Hot Rod, Car Craft, and Motor Trend you'd have thought the world was coming to an end.
I believe the '85 Cadillac was first to have them.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 12:35 PM
ZardozSpeakstoYou's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Garland, Texas
Posts: 336
Photos: (5)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Look, the future is going to be smaller, more economical cars. There will still be performance cars and Im pretty sure SRT will still be around but all cars are going to be smaller and more economical. The days of 15 mpg V8s are going away soon. Yes, CAFE standards are across the an entire company so they may be able to keep making Vipers and Vettes in very small numbers but if anybody thinks the new Cuda is going to be anything like the Challenger you are delusional. Think Subaru BRZ, that is a glimpse of the future I believe. Im not a fan, thats why I jumped on my RTC this year. The sun is setting.

Also; Ive had plenty of cars and been a member in lots of different forums. Sometimes they get ruined by BS political crap. Speaking for myself, I really would like all the politics stuff to go somewhere else. This is a car forum, isnt it?
__________________

ZardozSpeakstoYou
2012 Dodge Challenger R/T Classic 6 spd
1973 Dodge B-100 Tradesman Shorty No-Window Van
2005 Dodge 1500 Hemi Quadcab
2007 Harley Davidson FLHT

Last edited by ZardozSpeakstoYou; 11-11-2012 at 12:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZardozSpeakstoYou For This Useful Post:
omen omega (11-11-2012)
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 12:45 PM
pdx.challenger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: ORegon
Posts: 3,108
Photos: (1)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 68 Times in 57 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Originally Posted by ZardozSpeakstoYou View Post
Look, the future is going to be smaller, more economical cars. There will still be performance cars and Im pretty sure SRT will still be around but all cars are going to be smaller and more economical. The days of 15 mpg V8s are going away soon. Yes, CAFE standards are across the an entire company so they may be able to keep making Vipers and Vettes in very small numbers but if anybody thinks the new Cuda is going to be anything like the Challenger you are delusional. Think Subaru BRZ, that is a glimpse of the future I believe. Im not a fan, thats why I jumped on my RTC this year. The sun is setting.
Even before the BRZ came along, Fiat/Chrysler/Dodge was already targeting the Hyundai Genesis for the next generation. This isn't simply my opinion, it was mentioned in a couple of articles some time ago.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 01:34 PM
Yahooligan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 1,707
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 146 Times in 111 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to Yahooligan
Seems there's a lot of confusion about CAFE in this thread.

The CAFE standard varies depending on a vehicle's footprint (wheelbase x track). Larger vehicles are subject to lower CAFE requirements. Smaller vehicles are subject to the higher requirements.

CAFE requirements are VERY different than the EPA estimates and even the real-world fuel economy numbers we see. They use a different formula to determine whether or not a vehicle meets the requirement.

CAFE doesn't force manufacturers to produce vehicles that meet or exceed the requirements. They are more than welcome to produce and sell vehicles whose CAFE numbers are below the requirement, the mfr simply has to pay a fine per vehicle sold for every mpg under the requirement. All things considered, it's a relatively small fine and the mfr could offset the cost by raising the price of the vehicle. The fine at this time is $55/mpg/vehicle. If a mfr's CAFE rating is 3mpg below the standard for a given category then they will have to pay of $165 per vehicle sold in that category.

Mfrs can also earn credits for exceeding the standard and they can also trade credits from one category to another. In recent years, Chrysler has actually exceeded the requirements and has earned credits that can be applied in the future (Up to 5 years) should they end up below the requirement.

There's a lot of BS around CAFE, IMO. Any mfr claiming a model can't continue due to CAFE requirements is full of it and is just using it as an excuse.
__________________
- 2011 Challenger R/T Classic GWE 6-speed, 27M, Hurst Billet Pro shifter, SX catch can, SX skip-shift eliminator, Charger intake tube, Blastin' Bobs reso delete, BC coilovers, Razor's Edge front and rear 4-point braces, SPC UCAs, SPC rear camber bushings, Nitto NT05 255/45ZR20


Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Yahooligan For This Useful Post:
#32 of 1100 (11-12-2012), GreatAmerican (11-13-2012), Manichee (11-12-2012), nraider420h (11-14-2012), omen omega (11-11-2012)
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2012, 01:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 440
Photos: (0)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Yahooligan there is too much information in your post it makes it really hard to cry and claim that the goverment is going to send its Special forces team to take back our cars....


I think engines are becoming more efficiant and V6 engines are going into supercars. Porsche, GT-R. it only makes sense to go lighter in cars it performs better when you do that. So many people on the site complain about the weight of our cars.

It is the future and it is one where Naturally aspirated V6's are getting 350 to 400 hp and still getting 31mpg. If they would of offered a twin turbo V6 that put out as many hp as the SRT that I bought I probably would of went that route. It would of been 200lbs lighter and perform better.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Useful Information, Tips, and Tricks about the Challenger Venthos How-To, DIY and Tips & Tricks 0 07-15-2008 06:14 PM
Challenger news... (compilation and a few new details) mopar2ya General Challenger Discussion 11 01-27-2008 11:20 AM
Dodge Lays Down 'Challenger' to Mustang Mr.DJ Dodge Challenger News 13 07-07-2006 10:33 AM
Muscle car is reborn: Dodge 'Challenger' is back Mr.DJ Dodge Challenger News 1 06-30-2006 06:27 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.