Dodge Challenger Forum Dodge Challenger Forum

Welcome to the largest Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. This website is dedicated to friendly discussion of the new Dodge Challenger. The Challenger forum has discussion areas which cater to the Dodge Challenger SRT8, Dodge Challenger R/T, Dodge Challenger SE and everything in between. Registered users see less ads. Please Register For Free today!
Go Back   Dodge Challenger Forum > Dodge Challenger Forum > General Discussion
Register Home Challenger Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Discussion This section contains general discussion about the new Dodge Challenger concept. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)


   
ChallengerTalk.com is the premier Dodge Challenger Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 01:04 PM
Junior Member
Points: 1,939, Level: 17
Points: 1,939, Level: 17 Points: 1,939, Level: 17 Points: 1,939, Level: 17
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 23
Photos: (0)
sports v. muscle

I've read several post and threads concerning weight and length.

I think this is the difference between muscle cars and sports cars.
I maybe wrong but the muscle cars of the past were "big" while sports cars were smaller.

The new Challanger is by far a muscle car where large in this case is good.
I like a large car with 'go' off the start(torque) and the Challanger brings that back.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 03:08 PM
E-Body's Avatar
Senior Member
Points: 2,607, Level: 21
Points: 2,607, Level: 21 Points: 2,607, Level: 21 Points: 2,607, Level: 21
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 163
Photos: (0)
Re: sports v. muscle

To me...

A Musclecar IS a Sportscar

A Sportscar however is not always a Musclecar

The definition of either varies depending on how you feel about each.
__________________
~Michael
Previous:
'71 440-6 'Cuda
'73 360 Barracuda
Planned:
'09 HemiCuda clone
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 03:25 PM
Ted@MPSC's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
Points: 4,537, Level: 28
Points: 4,537, Level: 28 Points: 4,537, Level: 28 Points: 4,537, Level: 28
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: N Charleston, SC
Posts: 283
Photos: (24)
Re: sports v. muscle

Originally Posted by E-Body
To me...

A Musclecar IS a Sportscar

A Sportscar however is not always a Musclecar

The definition of either varies depending on how you feel about each.
Couldn't have said it any better, a muscle car is a sports car, however a sports car is not always muscle car.
__________________
Mopar Supercenter Discount Parts Center
800-456-5337


2008 SRT8 CHALLENGER #6278


Mods:
Cabin Air Filter
PCM Cover
Mopar Performance Cat-Back
More to come....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 03:39 PM
WildBillTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Points: 2,391, Level: 20
Points: 2,391, Level: 20 Points: 2,391, Level: 20 Points: 2,391, Level: 20
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kilgore TX
Posts: 117
Photos: (1)
Re: sports v. muscle

It used to be a musclecar is better suited for straight line dragging, while a sportscar was for racing, but the lines between both have really blurred.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 08:28 PM
Andrew's Avatar
Member
Points: 2,131, Level: 18
Points: 2,131, Level: 18 Points: 2,131, Level: 18 Points: 2,131, Level: 18
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 79
Photos: (0)
Re: sports v. muscle

Wikipedia defines a muscle car as:

The term muscle car generally describes a mid-size car with a large, powerful engine (typically, although not universally, a V8 engine) and special trim, intended for maximum acceleration on the street or in drag racing competition. It is distinguished from sports cars, which were customarily considered smaller, two-seat cars, or GTs, two-seat or 2+2 cars intended for high-speed touring and possibly road racing. High-performance full-size or compact cars are arguably excluded from this category, as are the breed of compact sports coupes inspired by the Ford Mustang and typically known as pony cars, although few would dispute a big-block pony car's credentials as a muscle car.
An alternate definition is based on power-to-weight ratio, defining a muscle car as an automobile with (for example) fewer than 12 pounds per rated horsepower. Such definitions are inexact, thanks to a wide variation in curb weight depending on options and to the questionable nature of the SAE gross horsepower ratings in use before 1972, which were often deliberately overstated or underrated for various reasons.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 11:09 PM
Senior Member
Points: 2,434, Level: 20
Points: 2,434, Level: 20 Points: 2,434, Level: 20 Points: 2,434, Level: 20
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 177
Photos: (0)
Re: sports v. muscle

Originally Posted by tekhen
I've read several post and threads concerning weight and length.

I think this is the difference between muscle cars and sports cars.
I maybe wrong but the muscle cars of the past were "big" while sports cars were smaller.

The new Challanger is by far a muscle car where large in this case is good.
I like a large car with 'go' off the start(torque) and the Challenger brings that back.
In my book the Challenger will be a true muscle car, but not a sports car.

IMHO, the best definition of a sports car, is the capability of going from point A to point B in the most efficient way, meaning in the shortest possible time, no matter what type of road it would have to tackle.
Now, a muscle car, IMHO has most of what a sport cars has, but lacks in the fact that, due to its weight and sheer size, it would be at a clear disadvantage in roads/road courses where turns are involved.

Now, I love the Challenger because it will be a muscle car, that's what I want. But I don't kid myself into thinking it will be a sports car. Example: if someone in a Porsche 911S would ask me to take a few laps against him at the old Nuerburgring (it has over 160 curves for each lap), I would probably decline because that's a sports car, very well suited in this type of racing.
While if the same guy would ask me to do some drag racing, I would be willing to accept his challenge.

Finally, there is no shame in the fact the Challenger is a muscle car, no shame at all. But if people in this forum are looking for a true sport cars, they better look elsewhere.
My $0.02
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 11:20 PM
04SRT4MAN's Avatar
Junior Member
Points: 1,830, Level: 17
Points: 1,830, Level: 17 Points: 1,830, Level: 17 Points: 1,830, Level: 17
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19
Photos: (0)
Re: sports v. muscle

Originally Posted by Legion681
In my book the Challenger will be a true muscle car, but not a sports car.

IMHO, the best definition of a sports car, is the capability of going from point A to point B in the most efficient way, meaning in the shortest possible time, no matter what type of road it would have to tackle.
Now, a muscle car, IMHO has most of what a sport cars has, but lacks in the fact that, due to its weight and sheer size, it would be at a clear disadvantage in roads/road courses where turns are involved.

Now, I love the Challenger because it will be a muscle car, that's what I want. But I don't kid myself into thinking it will be a sports car. Example: if someone in a Porsche 911S would ask me to take a few laps against him at the old Nuerburgring (it has over 160 curves for each lap), I would probably decline because that's a sports car, very well suited in this type of racing.
While if the same guy would ask me to do some drag racing, I would be willing to accept his challenge.
Good comparison between the Porsche and the Challenger; the Challenger will have decent handling and far better lateral accelleration than the musclecars of old, but a higher end Porsche will give you the muscle AND handling to boot. Brute force is always fun, but a powerful sports car (Z06, Porsche, etc) will give you both.
For street use, the Challenger will be a blast to drive
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2006, 05:45 AM
WildBillTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Points: 2,391, Level: 20
Points: 2,391, Level: 20 Points: 2,391, Level: 20 Points: 2,391, Level: 20
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kilgore TX
Posts: 117
Photos: (1)
Re: sports v. muscle

Originally Posted by 04SRT4MAN
Good comparison between the Porsche and the Challenger; the Challenger will have decent handling and far better lateral accelleration than the musclecars of old, but a higher end Porsche will give you the muscle AND handling to boot. Brute force is always fun, but a powerful sports car (Z06, Porsche, etc) will give you both.
For street use, the Challenger will be a blast to drive
I think the new Challenger will wind up being one of the best handling musclecars ever built. Remember it has Mercedes heritage underneath.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2006, 07:38 AM
allhemi's Avatar
Senior Member
Points: 4,867, Level: 29
Points: 4,867, Level: 29 Points: 4,867, Level: 29 Points: 4,867, Level: 29
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,206
Photos: (0)
Re: sports v. muscle

Originally Posted by E-Body
To me...

A Musclecar IS a Sportscar

A Sportscar however is not always a Musclecar

The definition of either varies depending on how you feel about each.

Thats the way I would see it.....
__________________
David
2005 Dodge Ram 1500 (Yeah, It's Got A HEMI!)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:49 AM
Senior Member
Points: 3,094, Level: 23
Points: 3,094, Level: 23 Points: 3,094, Level: 23 Points: 3,094, Level: 23
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 156
Photos: (0)
Re: sports v. muscle

A muscle car is NOT a sport's car.

Sports Car= Porsche, Corvette, Viper, etc

Muscle Car= Challenger, Riveria Gran Sport (65'ish) 442's, GTO's or the Gran National.

Give me a muscle car anyday!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Dodge Challenger Forum > Dodge Challenger Forum > General Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DODGE CHALLENGER: A lot of muscle Mr.DJ General Discussion 1 02-02-2006 10:39 AM
Media - MoPar Muscle HEMEEE Picture/Media/Art Post 5 01-26-2006 07:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.