![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Challenger Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Discussion This section contains general discussion about the new Dodge Challenger concept. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
I always wondered what size a motor had to be to be considered a big block. Mopar 383's back in the day were considered big blocks (or mid-block LOL) so I would guess getting around that cubic inch makes it a big block..
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
![]()
__________________
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
The main differances would be cylinder bore spacing and the cylinder wall thickness to allow a maximum bore size.
The old production A block went up to 5.9L (273, 318, 340, 360 CI) The B block engines were 383, 400, 413, 426 cubes (or 6.3 - 7.0L) The RB blocks were 440 and cubes (or 7.2L) these had a longer stroke than the B block. The 426 Hemi was different enough from the RB engines that it had major differances, including the cross-bolted mains that the B/RB engines didn't have and the staggered valve layout and physically larger valves the Hemi heads allowed.
__________________
2009 R/T 27J pkg (6 speed MT) ordered 7/17/08, - built 10/23/08, home on 11/13/08
Last edited by Hal H : 09-01-2008 at 06:03 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
The RB was the 413, 426 wedge & hemi, and 440. The 400 was a bored out 383 and therefore a B block. The RB mean't "raised B"....higher deck height. The Street Hemi (426) was essentially a 426 wedge with hemi heads....although there were some differences in casting.
__________________
Current Mopars: 2006 Dodge Charger SRT8, 1997 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0L, 1986 Dodge Van 318, 1977 Dodge Aspen R/T 318, 1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340. Beyond the Palace, Hemi-powered drones scream down the Boulevard. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
__________________
09 CHALLENGER SRT ON ORDER! HEMI ORANGE, SUNROOF, MY GIG, TIRE UPGRADE! DAYTONA SOLD !!!!! See My Daytona!
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
exactly. its a small block with the torque and power of a big block. I think it would be considered a big block if it had more cylinder wall thickness, so it could be "over bored" more. Those walls are just too thin
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is the SRT8 6.1 Hemi Considered a "Big Block"?
"Big"-block and "Small"-block are merely relative terms, dating back to when manufacturers had multiple engine-architectures in production at any one time. It really didn't have any relation to absolute numbers of cubic inches or bore-spacings, and there certainly wasn't any industry "standard" for the designation.
So, if you really wanted, I suppose you could call the current 4.7L V-8 the current "small"-block and the 5.7/6.1/6.4 engines the "big"-blocks of today. Or not, as the terms are as anachronistic as saying that the 6.1 motor in the SRT's comes with a "3/4-race" camshaft, "Hi-Po" heads and "turbo mufflers." |
|||||||||||||||||
|