Will there be a Next Generation Dodge Challenger? - Page 3 - Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums

General Challenger Discussion This section contains general discussion about the Dodge Challenger. If it does not fit into a more specific area, it probably belongs in here. (Dodge Challenger General Discussion)

View Poll Results: Will there be a Fourth Generation Challenger after 2014?
No, Dodge will stop the Challenger 126 61.76%
Yes, Dodge will redesign the Challenger 78 38.24%
Voters: 204. You may not vote on this poll

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-10-2011, 11:36 PM
Senior Member
jsd512's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Deer Park, TX
Posts: 2,080
Thanks: 83
Thanked 250 Times in 138 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I am still optimistic. I vote there will be a next generation addressing the major issues: less mass, higher mpg model, more power, improved interior quality etc.

Challenger Yearly Sales Figures:

2008: 17,423
2009: 25,852
2010: 36,791
2011: 39,534
2012: 43,119
2013: 51,462
2014: 51,611
2015: 66,365
2016: 51,141
jsd512 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #22 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-10-2011, 11:39 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
runner2go's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 9
Thanked 119 Times in 82 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by phillie86 View Post
Unfortunately Dodge will never be a Porsche. And going a long time without a redesign hurts a car's name and legacy. Look at the 300.
The 300 was doing just fine until the butchered it this year... and the lower sales are proving that out.
Which is why I really hate to think about what they might do to our beloved Challenger.

Saw yet another factory grill on a new 300c at Carlisle this weekend... they're still searching for something folks might like.
The latest cheese grater... at the Mopar Performance display.

The Herd
2010 Challenger 6sp Mopar10, & 2009 300c Black (The wife's)
1974 Challenger 360 Auto, & 2003 Ram (for Towing)
1970 Road Runner 440+6 4sp, & 1966 Charger 383 4sp

Last edited by runner2go; 12-24-2011 at 12:56 PM.
runner2go is offline  
post #23 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 08:20 AM
Senior Member
SRT8Tech's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 0
Thanked 505 Times in 286 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Only way I would buy a new Challenger is if it looked nearly the same and it had an engine with at least 550 HP. Other than that, Im keeping my 392. Oh and the price cant be all jacked up either. LOL

2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD
2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD
2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD
2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD

Current ride
100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28
With drag radials, tune and CAI...............best of 12.008 @ 115.74
SRT8Tech is offline  
post #24 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 09:02 AM
Senior Member
IDMTfirefighter's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: So. IL near St. Louis
Posts: 9,239
Thanks: 705
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,180 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Challenger, right now, just does not command the name recognition that Camaro and Mustang has.
New/future challengers needs to be competitively priced and with enough options to appeal to a wide variety of buyers.
Ford has done with with great success with the Mustang.
As Ironside pointed out...if you "build your own" online the challenger comes out way overpriced.
Whatever happens at least the line has run long enough that decent aftermarket support should remain for a good long while.
Did not vote since there was not a "don't know whats going to happen" option


2009 TorRed S/E

- Greater love has no one than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. John 15:13
- All you can take with you is that which you have given away...Peter Bailey, Bailey Brothers Building and Loan
IDMTfirefighter is offline  
post #25 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 09:22 AM
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
i think it will redesign
gatesauto is offline  
post #26 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 09:43 AM Thread Starter
phillie86's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to phillie86 Send a message via Skype™ to phillie86
(Thread Starter)
Wow almost 70% of you guys think the Challenger will not be back. Interesting poll results.. glad I made this.
phillie86 is offline  
post #27 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 10:14 AM
Senior Member
19johned53's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: "State of Missery"
Posts: 7,126
Thanks: 4,165
Thanked 3,448 Times in 2,114 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Don't know, but I'm thinking not. I'm at the age that it really doesn't matter to me what they do. I have the "one" that I want, and will pass on to my son some day.

It would be sad to see them screw this "Challenger" up with "new and improved" thinking.

We have the ultimate production "retro muscle" right now. Not the fastest, but fast, the best looking of anything out there, and it's a comfortable cruiser with substance.

If I wanted smaller, I would have looked at Mustangs, but Ford did the usual, IMO, and jacked up the looks on their lastest offering. The 5.0 is a strong motor, but the Mustang doesn't have the "looks" or "beef" that I like in a car.

Chevy, not even in my thoughts, unless they did a "retro" as good as Chrysler for a '68 Camaro.

Bottom line, I'm not trading for a new Challenger, redesigned, or upgraded. I love what I have, and if I live long enough, I'll mod it when needed, the good old American way, myself.

The Past: 2010 Detonator Yellow R/T "Classic" RIP Old Buddy 6/4/15

The Present: 2016 R/T Scat Pack. Factory Options: B5 Blue, 24G Package(A8), WRT Wheels, and Modern R/T Hood Stripe. Engine Mods: Nope............Doesn't need any.

19johned53 is online now  
post #28 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 11:01 AM
Lifetime Premium Member

The Perp's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Covington Ga
Posts: 563
Thanks: 217
Thanked 165 Times in 94 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Interested only in the one make and model I have as well. I think the price put it out of reach for the normal "ford " people and that's not a bad thing. The content of the car reflects the cost..at least thats the way I see my baby! I would love to see a cuda tho!

You never hear of anyone getting sick from smoking their tires..www.theperp.com
The Perp is offline  
post #29 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 11:06 AM Thread Starter
phillie86's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to phillie86 Send a message via Skype™ to phillie86
(Thread Starter)
The 5.0 is a great motor. Unfortunately they have more HP then Torque. If that thing had better torque across the band, it would be a killer little pony.

And thats the thing. The mustang isnt a muscle car, its a pony car.
The camaro and Challenger are REAL muscle cars due to their size.
phillie86 is offline  
post #30 of 147 (permalink) Old 07-11-2011, 11:16 AM
Lifetime Premium Member
AdventurerSport's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Morningside
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I believe that the redesign will be called Cuda, and that we will see whatever upgrades have been made to the other LX series cars by 2014 (I.e. Charger and 300 upgrades like Nav, keyless entry and start, one touch up and down windows, etc)

Could keep building basically the sane car for another 5-6 years easily. I hope the next gen addresses the issues like weight, power, mileage, etc, but I don't see that happening unless it also appears on the rest of the LX cars first.


Proud Owner of Mopar 10 #483
Silver Stripe, Automatic
2011 Ram 1500 5.7L Hemi 4x4
2016 Jeep Cherokee Limited 4x4
1976 Dodge Power Wagon 318 4x4
1976 Chrysler Conqueror 21' boat, 360
AdventurerSport is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums > General, Performance, and Technical > General Challenger Discussion

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Challenger Forum: Challenger & SRT8 Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 Challenger Information Thread ResumeSpeed General Challenger Discussion 1309 04-14-2015 04:13 AM
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8 ResumeSpeed 6.4L / 392ci (2011 - ?) 36 11-28-2012 04:44 AM
2013 Dodge Challenger ResumeSpeed General Challenger Discussion 8 09-02-2012 09:26 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome