![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Challenger Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Off-Topic Discussion This area contains discussion that does not fit into the other sections above. All Off-Topic discussion belongs in here. Please keep this section work safe. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Is Chrysler capable of making a CTS-V's beater
This is the first time I'm making a thread on this forum, but I'm hoping one big-@$$ boss would see this:
Is Chrysler capable of making a car to kick the **** out of CTS-V?? the new car spec has been released As with the SRT-10 vs Z06, I wish I can see 4-door sedan either 300C or Charger capable to stand in the face of this bad dog. 556hp, 3.9s, 12sec run and 191mph are far from achievement with the current 6.1L or even 6.4L without the blower. The 392CI can make 550hp and 500+ of torque and the best top speed with the 6.1L is the Challenger's with something around 180mph (Don't remember exactly). This car is almost as fast as the '06 SRT-10 which is not good for Dodge fans (I hate GM in general) Chrysler please bring this car NIGHTMARE.. ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is Chrysler capable of making a CTS-V's beater
I live near a stretched highway and also a drag strip. So, with My CHALLENGER I'll both street race and drag race. When I'm thinking of buying the Challenger I'm opting for the 392 (when it comes available) my only concern is the Holden SS-V. The CTS-V isn't gonna be cheap (maybe around the same price as the standard 911) so I wouldn't see it or get bothered by it as I'm with the SS-V. All I'm trying to see is if the CTS and the 300C are in the same class, then I think Chrysler should start looking into their MOPAR catalog and drop some missile into the 300C. The 600hp SRT10 is below 3.5sec, so if the 300C or Charger came down to sub 4sec it wouldn't hurt our beautiful halo car.
About the speed tickets, I don't car that much as long as I don't get my license suspended. Beside, I'm 25 and I wanna know how it felt like in the late '60s during the muscle cars war. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is Chrysler capable of making a CTS-V's beater
I don't get the comparison. If Chrysler put a supercharger on the 6.1 they could easily get to 550HP... Maybe more?
All GM did was slap a supercharger on the 7.0 LS7(correction 6.2). For a SC on that size motor, it's WEAK! They must have detuned it so it wouldn't beat the Z06. (correction, the 6.2 w/SC is the 09 CTS-V from what I can tell... now the HP sounds about right) The PPP 7.0L setup has 519 RearWheel HP w/o a supercharger and runs 11.080 in the 1/4... So yeah, Chrysler could EASILY match those numbers, but it would be too much investment if it was ONLY for bragging rights (ie, not sales)
__________________
RadarmagneT 2006 Red Charger R/T... JetHot + Dynatech Headers&Cats, Magnaflowed, K&N AirCharger, AutoHeadlight, roof RD power, 35% 3M tint...dyno=302rwHP,345rwTQ Last edited by RadarmagneT : 06-10-2008 at 09:59 AM. Reason: 6.2 not 7.0 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is Chrysler capable of making a CTS-V's beater
Yea the price range is a big gap. You could take that money and easily kill a CTS-V in a charger
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Is Chrysler capable of making a CTS-V's beater
Originally Posted by Ragamuffin
Mid sized??? That must mean the Chrysler 300 is also a mid-size. Hmm..I thought it was a full sized car.
Mid sized would be the Avenger and Sebring....at least by todays standards. Chrysler does build a car that beats the CTS-V. The Viper.
__________________
Current Mopars: 2006 Dodge Charger SRT8, 1997 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0L, 1986 Dodge Van 318, 1977 Dodge Aspen R/T 318, 1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340. Beyond the Palace, Hemi-powered drones scream down the Boulevard. |
|||||||||||||||||
|