Looking on the dodge site I was surprised to see the 2010 SRT rear axle ratio was listed at 3.02 compared to the 2011 SRT 3.92 ratio. I see people going on about the RT 3.75 ratio vs the 3.92 ratio...
I'm considering both a 2010 or 2011 SRT with manual transmission. What am I going to notice between the 3.02 vs the 3.92 ratios? Why did they up it so much? Any longevity issues?