2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat First Test - Motor Trend
Non-mobile friendly version of the article.
doesn't sound all that great to me, sounds like he is saying it may be faster than ford or chevy but they handle much much better.
"Conclusion. Get some fatter, stickier rear meats for the Challenger Hellcat and it really does have the intestinal fortitude to embarrass cars costing double and triple the price. A retired and wheeled Hellcat would probably smack that Shelby around pretty good, too. Until then, Hellcat owners can happily chew on the knowledge that the next cheapest 700-horsepower steed in existence is the $322,638, 731-hp Ferrari F12 Berlinetta. More important, I've driven both cars and would much rather drive the Hellcat. I've also spent a great deal of time in the Shelby GT500. And the Viper. And the ZL1. Hellcat, hands down. Hats off to the Dodge boys. They've built an all-timer."
Sounds like a good verdict to me. Yes, the Hellcat will not decimate all on a road-course, we know that. And if you try to make it a track-day car, as the article rightly points out, you're missing the point. With that said, even though on paper you'd think it wouldn't handle well, it actually does:
"If you really must know, the Hellcat can be wanged around our figure-eight course in 24.7 seconds. That's the exact same time as an Alfa Romeo 4C, actually."