Dodge Challenger Forum banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
174 Posts
Discussion Starter #1



The iconic trio of muscle cars has been subjected to crash tests and the results aren’t ideal.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has evaluated the 2016 Dodge Challenger, 2016 Ford Mustang and 2016 Chevrolet Camaro for their crash worthiness and none of them were able to get a Top Safety Pick designation. The agency typically doesn’t test sports cars, but it tested these three models with V8 engines because they are higher volume sellers in their class.

The results show that the Challenger is in need of the most improvement, while the Mustang came the closest to getting the coveted Top Safety Pick award, and the Camaro fell short in one category.

To get the Top Safety Pick designation, cars must get good ratings in the small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests as well as some sort of basic front collision avoidance system (like a warning system). To get the Top Safety Pick+ designation, the car must get a good rating in all five tests and have an advance crash mitigation system (like automatic emergency braking).

All three pony cars earned good ratings for the occupant protection, side impact and moderate overlap front crash. In the newest and toughest test, the small overlap front test that simulates when a car hits a tree or pole or clips an oncoming car, the Camaro earned a good rating, the Mustang was acceptable and the Challenger got a marginal rating.
Read more about the No Pony Cars Awarded as a Top Safety Pick at AutoGuide.com.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,451 Posts
I realize certain standard tests are useful for comparison purposes, but what these comparisons DON'T show, is a cars' potential to avoid an accident in the first place! Items like brakes, tires, and general overall handling, as well as driver experience can make all of the difference. I particularly like the amount of crush space in the Challenger. Out of the 3 cars compared, in the real world, I'd rather be in the Challenger because there's more room to begin with. Once crashed, I have to believe the other two could be pretty confined to get out of.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
781 Posts
I realize certain standard tests are useful for comparison purposes, but what these comparisons DON'T show, is a cars' potential to avoid an accident in the first place! Items like brakes, tires, and general overall handling, as well as driver experience can make all of the difference. I particularly like the amount of crush space in the Challenger. Out of the 3 cars compared, in the real world, I'd rather be in the Challenger because there's more room to begin with. Once crashed, I have to believe the other two could be pretty confined to get out of.

Ditto.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
About this Discussion
2 Replies
3 Participants
UltimateChallenger
Dodge Challenger Forum
Challenger Talk, the online forum for discussions, reviews of Dodge Challenger, and all things SRT, Hellcat, and Demon.
Full Forum Listing
Top