This was a tough decision between eldebrock e fore or procharger i did allot of research and went procharger
Very good reasons I concur. Initially I was shopping for a ProCharger, Vortech, or Turbo setup. I even had an STS system spec'd and quoted. Price ultimately won me over as I got the E-Force for about what I would've paid for a ProCharger.first would be price, 2nd i guess the way it comes on for street racing. 3rd i still dont know why because i love the look of the edelbrock.
Very good reasons I concur. Initially I was shopping for a ProCharger, Vortech, or Turbo setup. I even had an STS system spec'd and quoted. Price ultimately won me over as I got the E-Force for about what I would've paid for a ProCharger.
A family member who works in the Mustang/Ford world heavily heavily recommended the Edelbrock to me. I inherently trust their opinions and experience as they know their stuff very well. Though I must say that with traction already being a problem the E-Force only enhanced the issue. In the Mustang world they may need the extra oompf to get them going off the line. Hence the overt recommendation of screw based FI. Our Challengers already bring in a lot of grunt at the low end. So while my Ebrock is as advertised and absolutely amazing having over 400 ft lb of tq at just over 2k RPM does not help the spinning issue. Though since I've recently installed a new set of GY F1 super car tires and the weather is warming up my grip issues has subsided somewhat.
I know it's all a bit wordy but I guess in the end I like to pick the centrifugal/turbo guys brains whenever I get the chance. Kind of a grass is greener scenario. One day I may go centrifugal on another car and miss the low end punch that I've gotten used to from my twin screw setup. Post up some dyno charts and give us a ride report when you get here done. I'd like to experience the difference vicariously through you and other centri/turbo owners. It's less expensive that way lol!
That is a 129whp increase from where I was before. I was 387whp NA before. I had 392 cam, PWR heads, and JBA long tubes with catless mids.
I highly doubt you will. Looking back on it keeping it stock and slapping a supercharger on the car would've been the best route to take. Way way less money spent for sure.i agree, but i have a complete stock car and will not do any mods to it. I will let you guy guys know if i regret it or not.
How much power are you putting down? Super Sports are the stickiest tire for the street right now. Surprised you were spinning even those... In a 295 to boot!I'm a newly Procharger owner on my what was already heavily modded 5.7 engine and I must say that my procharger has blown every mod that I did out of the water. I'm spinning the tires in 2nd gear from a rolling start of about 45-50 mph my traction control has saved me twice already when the boost comes on make sure u have it pointed straight. And btw my rear meats are 295/35/20 Michelin pilot super sports! Enjoy!
Sent from AutoGuide.com App