Joined
·
257 Posts
Just got a 392 ... trading in a Classic R/T.
Bottom line.. the Challenger (IMO) sits too high.
Lowered the Classic using Eibach... worked/looked great.
NOW with the 392... is the trade-off to lower actually going to be
a good or a bad thing? Any SRT techs on here with real info
on what improvements have been made, etc. on the 2011 392?
Thanks in advance.
I'd really like to lower the stance, but not if it's going to hurt
performance/handling.
Bottom line.. the Challenger (IMO) sits too high.
Lowered the Classic using Eibach... worked/looked great.
NOW with the 392... is the trade-off to lower actually going to be
a good or a bad thing? Any SRT techs on here with real info
on what improvements have been made, etc. on the 2011 392?
Thanks in advance.
I'd really like to lower the stance, but not if it's going to hurt
performance/handling.