Dodge Challenger Forum banner

A very accurate Challenger review

10K views 32 replies 16 participants last post by  RusTy/SE  
#1 ·
#3 ·
Probably just a typo as the bottom of the specs page shows the correct weight at 4,298 lbs..

It's an OK review. I don't understand swearing in a review unless his English is weak. Lazy perhaps.
 
#6 ·
Not my favorite piece of journalism, but not the worst one I've had the displeasure of suffering through. Overall it wasn't bad. Or maybe that was because I was distracted by all the lime green paint in the pictures?
 
#8 ·
The biggest thing I have grown tired of, in 50 or so years of reading car articles, is the rough ride remarks. If you want an easy ride then keep your a** out of a sports car. Go test a Crown Imperial. SHEESH!! Performance cars have performance suspensions. "I don't always sit in my driveway and listen to my exhaust but when I do so does the whole neighborhood".
 
#9 ·
There is a difference between a rough ride and a well-damped ride though. I would say the damping on the Challenger does leave something to be desired. Ride/drive a modern car with magneride and you will notice a distinct difference in body control and the way bumps are absorbed and damped.
 
#12 ·
Seemed about right to me.

IMO the Challenger is a bit of a min/max car.

It maxes out on styling, character, fun, soundtrack and power.

Everything else was clearly an after thought. Interior, build quality, refinement, technology, handling. None are spectacular, some are objectively bad. The average economy car has a better interior, better fit and finish, better paint and a better ride, let alone things at a similar price point.

However, if you really want the things it maxes out and don't care much about its weak points, you'll love it. I do.

But I'm not so much of a fanboy that I won't acknowledge that this focus makes it a flawed all-round car, especially for the average consumer.
 
#22 ·
It's true - now that a Scat Pack is $80-100k CAD in Canada, other than the spirit of the drive train and the swagger of the body, the Challenger has sweet nothing on any of the comparables.
Yeah, well. You can't get 700hp and a 6L+ V8 for 80K CAD anywhere else, so that's a big selling point. Not really surprising that they've had to compromise elsewhere really.

On the Challenger, I guess there's only so much you can do for the budget, and if it's all gone on drive train everything else is bound to suffer. Same story with a Mustang or a Camaro in terms of fit / finish / refinement / interior, albeit slightly more focus on handling.

As an example, that Audi A7 for HC money comes with a 335Hp 3.0L V6, so not exactly competitive in 'fun' factor, soundtrack or power. If Audi made an A7 with HC power and a V8 I'd be guessing more like $150k US...

Can't say I'm unhappy with Dodge's focus really, even if it does land me with a $30k US interior!
 
#25 ·
I'm sure we all have stories but mine is special... not really.. LOL. I put a 327 with a 671 atop in a 1953 Willy's Wagon. It had a 8 track stereo and a radio that took a few minutes to warm up. Of course, the only time you could hear either of those was when I was parked with the engine off. I had close to 11,000 wrapped up in it including the 1970's crazy paint scheme. She was fast but you couldn't drive her very fast or you'd lose control. Anything over 70 was a white knuckle ride. The vehicle itself was never intended to be a muscle car but no one doubted that it was. It was really hard to find anyone willing to race me light to light.

I'm not saying that this is what makes a muscle car, certainly that term seems to be reserved for something that comes off a production line. What I am saying is that if you're going to ridicule a muscle car because of its lack of amenities or even quality control, you're sadly misinterpreting the term "Muscle Car".
 
#26 ·
Fair, but if we really want to go back to what a "muscle car" is, then it is the biggest engine in an affordable package (see 1964 GTO), and an $80k-$150k ($CAD) car is no longer that I'm afraid.
The fact that Dodge offered cloth houndstooth seats in Scat packs and Hellcats instead of just leather harkens back a little bit (blending what would have been the Road Runner v. GTX packages), but these cars are well past that original concept.
 
#30 ·
GT-37

A Guy
 
#32 ·
That's good to remember and keep in mind, but I was of the opinion way back in 2017 with my first Challenger that the fit, finish, paint, interior, and tech were dated and on the lower end. That was back then, 2 years after the refresh. The base H3 that I traded for that Challenger had a nicer interior, and it was already a 10 year old vehicle at that point.
 
#33 ·
I agree with the article; it explains what hooked me from the moment I began driving my Challenger, although my own is a 5.7 A8 car.

Particularly this paragraph (since I run straight pipes):

"Theatrics and weight are the two biggest things you notice when you’re driving the Challenger Swinger. Every day is a show in this car, and whether they like it or not, everyone within one city block of you is the audience. This thing is loud. It doesn’t matter what gear you’re in, what your throttle position is, or how fast you’re going. Cold starts are also loud enough to start an incident that ends up on your neighborhood’s Facebook page. People will hear the Challenger Swinger coming. Then they’ll see its lime green paint and stare at you. If that isn’t good for your social anxiety, then this isn’t the car for you."

When me and the fiancé are out in mine, we continuously invoke the various Tim Allen pig grunts around other Mustangs, Camaros, and yes, other Challengers as well. 😁🤣